Good discussion.

In all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.

Theistic Creation = Mind Involved

Darwinian Evolution = Mind not involved.

Well, in all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.

Theistic Creation = Mind Involved

Darwinian Evolution = Mind not involved.

Well, in all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.

Theistic Creation = Mind Involved Darwinian Evolution = Mind not involved.

Well, in all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.