This is very good. Thank you for this post. This information will be in the history books at some point.
Q post xxx was when they’ve started to discredit Q as a source and the movement:
The Deep State actions to slow down and discredit were:
-
delay the refresh of #qanon twitter hash tag
-
add LGBT posts (post them with this hashtag to dilute the content of the hash tag page)
-
sticky useless and fake news
-
hide posts popular and already reliable commentators of Q (shadow ban), like StormIsUpponUs, InTheMatrixxx, PrayingMedic, Report 22, Paul Serran, etc.
-
ban the above accounts
-
add delay longer than 24-48 hours so people are discouraged to the tag seeing irrelevant, fake and old content.
-
at that point claiming that “qanon” is fake was a “legitimate” claim for them.
That’s part of the Deep State and media effort to create a fake version of reality.
Full Q post 4881 below:
--
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'ANONs'. 2
There is no 'QANON'. 3
Media labeling as 'QANON' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'ANONs' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
This is very good. Thank you for this post. This information will be on the history books at some point.
Q post xxx was when they’ve started to discredit Q as a source and the movement:
The Deep State actions to slow down and discredit were:
-
delay the refresh of #qanon twitter hash tag
-
add LGBT posts (post them with this hashtag to dilute the content of the hash tag page)
-
sticky useless and fake news
-
hide posts popular and already reliable commentators of Q (shadow ban), like StormIsUpponUs, InTheMatrixxx, PrayingMedic, Report 22, Paul Serran, etc.
-
ban the above accounts
-
add delay longer than 24-48 hours so people are discouraged to the tag seeing irrelevant, fake and old content.
-
at that point claiming that “qanon” is fake was a “legitimate” claim for them.
That’s part of the Deep State and media effort to create a fake version of reality.
Full Q post 4881 below:
--
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'ANONs'. 2
There is no 'QANON'. 3
Media labeling as 'QANON' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'ANONs' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
This is very good. Thank you for this post. This information will be on the history books at some point.
Q post xxx was when they’ve started to discredit Q as a source and the movement:
The Deep State actions to slow down and discredit were:
-
delay the refresh of #qanon twitter hash tag
-
add LGBT posts (post them with this hashtag to dilute the content of the hash tag page)
-
sticky useless and fake news
-
hide posts popular and already reliable commentators of Q (shadow ban), like StormIsUpponUs, InTheMatrixxx, PrayingMedic, Report 22, Paul Serran, etc.
-
ban the above accounts
-
add delay longer than 24-48 hours so people are discouraged to the tag seeing irrelevant, fake and old content.
-
at that point claiming that “qanon” is fake was a “legitimate” claim for them.
That’s part of the Deep State and media effort to create a fake version of reality.
Media labeling as 'QANON' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?