I like the content of your comments. I think the same message (hopefully) comes through in the post: preserving the integrity of the Q signal has to be the priority.

I hope no one is denying the content of the core post, that there is Q and there are anons. But it's relevant and important to actually read and understand the qdrop, and not get caught up in knee-jerk reactions. The core point was, as I understand it, that the Propaganda arm was attempting to mingle fake anon-derived content and associate it with Q. So distinguishing between Q and anons for the normie world not to mention newcomers became critical and important at that point.

That fact is not going away.

I don't know about reclaiming "qanon" at this point. I kind of think it will all work out as we go along.

They have hijacked "Qanon", which, as Bubble explains, deprived us and all the normies etc, of an excellent functioning search term.

seems like a small price to pay for you OG's.

We should be super clear. It's not about us. I do understand some of the frustration felt by older anons - Ethel's T-shirt comment above drives this home. But it's not about anyone's personal feelings. It's really about the mission. And this is why I prefaced the post with the statement:

He who forgets his past is liable to misunderstand the present and lose sight of the future!!!

I think at a minimum it should be fine for us to use the qanon expression amongst us, or at least, not go into fits by denying that qanon once existed or that it was indeed part of who we are. Such denial isn't grounded in fact. That's the real point.

The more all of us understand our history, whether your OG or newbie (thank God for the newbies!!!!), the better equipped we are to educate others on what the real deal is.

"There is only Q and there is only Anons" is only half the story. The other half is, for more than 2+ years, millions of patriots and anons around the world connected and networked and used "qanon" as a natural expression of who WE ARE.

Think of where the Great Awakening is today, and realize that there's a real history behind that.

A final point: evil ALWAYS seeks to create division and conflict where God originally designs for harmony and cooperation. The idea of teenagers rebelling against their elders is not natural nor original. It occurs only because there is a lot of distortion within the relationships, distortion caused by evil.

In the original framework, elders need the youngers, and younger need the elders. Elders often have the track record and the wisdom/experience (having made lots of the mistakes!), but the youngers have the passion, vision and energy.

So this issue about qanon should not be conceived as OG vs. Newbie. (My OG comment above was pretty much done tongue in cheek). It's about oK, how can we correctly understand the past, understand WHY Q needed to come out and clarify the distinction, and how we can now move ahead educating the public on what exactly is Q.

Your emphasis on the drops as the priority is spot on.

I like the content of your comments. I think the same message (hopefully) comes through in the post: preserving the integrity of the Q signal has to be the priority.

I hope no one is denying the content of the core post, that there is Q and there are anons. But it's relevant and important to actually read and understand the post, and not get caught up in knee-jerk reactions. The core point was, as I understand it, that the Propaganda arm was attempting to mingle fake anon-derived content and associate it with Q. So distinguishing between Q and anons for the normie world not to mention newcomers became critical and important at that point.

That fact is not going away.

I don't know about reclaiming "qanon" at this point. I kind of think it will all work out as we go along.

They have hijacked "Qanon", which, as Bubble explains, deprived us and all the normies etc, of an excellent functioning search term.

seems like a small price to pay for you OG's.

We should be super clear. It's not about us. I do understand some of the frustration felt by older anons - Ethel's T-shirt comment above drives this home. But it's not about anyone's personal feelings. It's really about the mission. And this is why I prefaced the post with the statement:

He who forgets his past is liable to misunderstand the present and lose sight of the future!!!

I think at a minimum it should be fine for us to use the qanon expression amongst us, or at least, not go into fits by denying that qanon once existed or that it was indeed part of who we are. Such denial isn't grounded in fact. That's the real point.

The more all of us understand our history, whether your OG or newbie (thank God for the newbies!!!!), the better equipped we are to educate others on what the real deal is.

"There is only Q and there is only Anons" is only half the story. The other half is, for more than 2+ years, millions of patriots and anons around the world connected and networked and used "qanon" as a natural expression of who WE ARE.

Think of where the Great Awakening is today, and realize that there's a real history behind that.

A final point: evil ALWAYS seeks to create division and conflict where God originally designs for harmony and cooperation. The idea of teenagers rebelling against their elders is not natural nor original. It occurs only because there is a lot of distortion within the relationships, distortion caused by evil.

In the original framework, elders need the youngers, and younger need the elders. Elders often have the track record and the wisdom/experience (having made lots of the mistakes!), but the youngers have the passion, vision and energy.

So this issue about qanon should not be conceived as OG vs. Newbie. (My OG comment above was pretty much done tongue in cheek). It's about oK, how can we correctly understand the past, understand WHY Q needed to come out and clarify the distinction, and how we can now move ahead educating the public on what exactly is Q.

Your emphasis on the drops as the priority is spot on.