Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

My current framing is to view "pacifiers" as those urging warriors to refuse to become psyop intoxicated but to instead remain sober.

Pacifiers =/= urging people to be inactive; in fact, just the opposite.

As an aside, one anti Q psyop narrative embraced by MAGA normies was that Q was a "pacifier" who encouraged people to be "complacent" when the opposite was true.

This anti Q narrative was fuelled post N3/J6 by glowie psyop posts on /pol/ stating that Q == a modern iteration of the Bolsheviks Operation Trust.

Whose plan was Q referencing? Gods.

Consequently, for humans I don't use the word trust. I prefer the word confidence.

For humans I prefer to pray for them while keeping busy doing what I can; allowing God to work with me and through me. I will see what others do and how things unfold, or I wont. Either way, I'm comfy knowing that God has already won.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

My current framing is to view "pacifiers" as those urging warriors to refuse to become psyop intoxicated but to instead remain sober.

Pacifiers =/= urging people to be inactive; in fact, just the opposite.

As an aside, one anti Q psyop narrative embraced by MAGA normies was that Q was a "pacifier" who encouraged people to be "complement". This anti Q narrative was fuelled post N3/J6 by glowie psyop posts on /pol/ stating that Q == modern iteration of the Bolsheviks Operation Trust.

Finally, whose plan was Q referencing? Gods. For humans I don't use the word trust. I prefer the word confidence. For humans I prefer to pray for them then to keep busy doing what I can; allowing God to work with me and through me.

2 years ago
1 score