Fair enough. I don't usually lose my cool like that and I am always open for discussion.

I was raised to avoid "weasel words" in speaking and writing. Words like 'I think', 'It appears to me', just my opinion' and 'I believe' are weasel words and as I was taught are an unnecessary waste of time for your reader or listener. Make your assertion clearly and unequivocally. Explain your assertion in like manner. Your reader (or listener) will decide the merit of your offering.

As we were discussing an unknowable point (whether or not the latest Q posts are in fact from the same Q) I did not see the need to point out that my assertion was based in opinion and not fact.

My view is simply this: the latest Q posts are not from the same Q team. I have expected that the Cabal would attempt to post as Q and hijack the movement at some point if their attacks on 'QAnon' failed. I expect this simply because it is a logical step to take. Given that the board was shown to have been compromised and the new posts were shown to have been manipulated coupled with the stark change in tone, polish and content I find it very difficult to imagine they are legitimate.

I am of like mind to you in that I see no reason at all to change course from this view however, if they are real, good. If they are false, fine. But at this point it doesn't really matter. If 'Q' starts pushing DeSantis 2024, then I'll know for sure.

Just my opinion, for what its worth, your mileage may vary.

Fair enough. I don't usually lose my cool like that and I am always open for discussion.

I was raised to avoid "weasel words" in speaking and writing. Words like 'I think', 'It appears to me', just my opinion' and 'I believe' are weasel words and as I was taught are an unnecessary waste of time for your reader or listener. Make your assertion clearly and unequivocally. Explain your assertion in like manner. Your reader (or listener) will decide the merit of your offering.

As we were discussing an unknowable point (whether or not the latest Q posts are in fact from the same Q) I did not see the need to point out that my assertion was based in opinion and not fact.

My view is simply this: the latest Q posts are not from the same Q team. I have expected that the Cabal would attempt to post as Q and hijack the movement at some point if their attacks on 'QAnon' failed. I expect this simply because it is a logical step to take. Given that the board was shown to have been compromised and the new posts were shown to have been manipulated coupled with the stark change in tone, polish and content I find it very difficult to imagine they are legitimate.

I am of like mind to you in that I see no reason at all to change course from this view however, if they are real, good. If they are false, fine. But at this point it doesn't really matter. If 'Q' starts pushing DeSantis 2024, then I'll know for sure.

Just my opinion, for what it's worth, your mileage may vary.

Fair enough. I don't usually lose my cool like that and I am always open for discussion.

I was raised to avoid "weasel words" in speaking and writing. Words like 'I think', 'It appears to me', just my opinion' and 'I believe' are weasel words and as I was taught are an unnecessary waste of time for your reader or listener. Make your assertion clearly and unequivocally. Explain your assertion in like manner. Your reader (or listener) will decide the merit of your offering.

As we were discussing an unknowable point (whether or not the latest Q posts are in fact from the same Q) I did not see the need to point out that my assertion was based in opinion and not fact.

My view is simply this: the latest Q posts are not from the same Q team. I have expected that the Cabal would attempt to post as Q and hijack the movement at some point if their attacks on 'QAnon' failed. I expect this simply because it is a logical step to take. Given that the board was shown to have been compromised and the new posts were shown to have been manipulated coupled with the stark change in tone, polish and content I find it very difficult to imagine they are legitimate.

I am of like mind to you in that I see no reason at all to change course from this view however, if they are real, good. If they are false, fine. But at this point it don't really matter. If 'Q' starts pushing DeSantis 2024, then I'll know for sure.

Just my opinion, for what it's worth, your mileage may vary.