I'm circling with you.

As I look to the center point as I circle, though, it seems to me that this election is and will always be a test of INTEGRITY.

In a show of Voter INTEGRITY, Voters came out on election day in person. It was a huge turnout on election day for in person voting for a midterm. This kinda contests the EAC push for mail only voting. Voters showed that they thought this election was important enough to come to the polls in person.

Irregularities and alleged fraud also showed up in this election. The RED wave/tsunami may have been covered (hidden) by the success of the irregularities/fraud, which was quickly covered (reported) by (complicit?) media.

Now, a test shows the good stuff and the bad. The TRUTH becomes more apparent in the circling, imho. As I consider the power of in person on election day voting, there is no ignoring authentic PRESENCE.

One more observation as I circle back to the "RED wave/tsunami". I wonder how much the mere mention of this prognostication affected the turnout of both in person voters and irregularities/"fraud". We don't know whether all these in person voters on election day voted red or blue, if the fraudulent votes were discarded as they should have been--if the counting had INTEGRITY. And it shouldn't matter whether legitimate votes were red or blue.

I now have a label for the center point that I have been circling around. The center point is TRUST. It is hard to trust something that is not trustworthy. Still struggling on that.

Boy, did your comment provoke thinking n me. I gotta get another cup of coffee now and ponder some more.

EDIT:

One more thing. If the vote counts include fraudulent ballots, what is certified in this election? Oh, the circles.

I'm circling with you.

As I look to the center point as I circle, though, it seems to me that this election is and will always be a test of INTEGRITY.

In a show of Voter INTEGRITY, Voters came out on election day in person. It was a huge turnout on election day for in person voting for a midterm. This kinda contests the EAC push for mail only voting. Voters showed that they thought this election was important enough to come to the polls in person.

Irregularities and alleged fraud also showed up in this election. The RED wave/tsunami may have been covered (hidden) by the success of the irregularities/fraud, which was quickly covered (reported) by (complicit?) media.

Now, a test shows the good stuff and the bad. The TRUTH becomes more apparent in the circling, imho. As I consider the power of in person on election day voting, there is no ignoring authentic PRESENCE.

One more observation as I circle back to the "RED wave/tsunami". I wonder how much the mere mention of this prognostication affected the turnout of both in person voters and irregularities/"fraud". We don't know whether all these in person voters on election day voted red or blue, if the fraudulent votes were discarded as they should have been--if the counting had INTEGRITY. And it shouldn't matter whether legitimate votes were red or blue.

I now have a label for the center point that I have been circling around. The center point is TRUST. It is hard to trust something that is not trustworthy. Still struggling on that.

Boy, did your comment provoke thinking n me. I gotta get another cup of coffee now and ponder some more.