Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide amongst the people called "The Jews," and thereby hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend. You, like pretty much everyone else, is falling for their ruse. You see the group they place in front of themselves, and you think they are the enemy.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This association fallacy, like all logical fallacies, inevitably leads to the wrong conclusions. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

Hitler was almost certainly controlled opposition.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide amongst the people called "The Jews," and thereby hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend. You, like pretty much everyone else, is falling for their ruse. You see the group they place in front of themselves, and you think they are the enemy.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This association fallacy, like all logical fallacies, inevitably leads to the wrong conclusions. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

Hitler was almost certainly controlled opposition.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide amongst the people called "The Jews," and thereby hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend. You, like pretty much everyone else, is falling for their ruse. You see the group they place in front of themselves, and you think they are the enemy.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This association fallacy, like all logical fallacies, inevitably leads to the wrong conclusions. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

Hitler was almost certainly controlled opposition.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide amongst the people called "The Jews," and thereby hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend. You, like pretty much everyone else, is falling for their ruse. You see the group they place in front of themselves, and you think they are the enemy.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This association fallacy, like all logical fallacies, inevitably leads to the wrong conclusions. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide amongst the people called "The Jews," and thereby hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend. You, like pretty much everyone else, is falling for their ruse. You see the group they place in front of themselves, and you think they are the enemy.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This is called an association fallacy. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide amongst the people called "The Jews," and thereby hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend. You, like pretty much everyone else, is falling for their ruse. You see the group they place in front of themselves, and you think they are the enemy.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than other the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This is called an association fallacy. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide amongst the people called "The Jews," and thereby hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than other the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This is called an association fallacy. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zoroastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than other the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This is called an association fallacy. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Germany had lots of good reasons for disliking Jews.

You are beginning with the exact association fallacy I was elaborating in my post. It's not "the Jews." It's never been "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. It is THIS SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE (who we call "The Elite") that created the idea of "anti-semitism." THEY created the narrative that "the Jews" have been "persecuted" throughout history. What they call "persecution" (say, in the middle ages e.g.) is, within the context of everything that happened at the time and how other groups were treated, something much more akin to "special privilege." There are a group of people that call themselves Jews that hide behind this association fallacy to commit crimes on a scale that is almost impossible to comprehend.

The people you are blaming for committing all the crimes you lay out are not "the Jews." It is a small group of people that call themselves Jews. My investigation suggests they don't even follow "Judaism." Instead, I think they follow the religion that came before the invention of Judaism. It is the religion that existed before that religion encountered Zorastrianism and became monotheistic. (Judaism isn't really monotheistic, but it is "One God higher than other the others," so it's close.)

I agree with all of the facts you state. I disagree with the implication that Hitler was acting on behalf of the German people. There is Huge amounts of context left out of your facts, especially the Eugenics program that was the main impetus for all the actions taken by the Third Reich. The same Eugenics program that was created by a small group of people, many of which call themselves "Jews."

You are seeing the wrong enemy, because you are mislabeling the people who committed the crimes. This is called an association fallacy. You are not seeing that Hitler was a part of that crew of the real enemy because you are not taking into account a metric fuckton of other relevant facts, notably the stated impetus for the actions taken.

2 years ago
1 score