Fair Warning: Long, boring, somewhat rambling post to follow:

I would really appreciate some help understanding something, and I mean this sincerely and not as a means to doom or start an argument or anything of that nature. This is something that has bothered me since I first learned about Q and started coming here.

Why do people speak of the military as if it's an autonomous entity and can DO anything on its own? A living, breathing, human being is required to orchestrate the actions of the military.

If we're going by the US Constitution, then the US military is under the command of the sitting President of the United States. Obviously Biden is not going to do anything of the nature of directing the military to act against him.

So the next alternative is the one that is mentioned the most around here and that is Trump is still secretly in control of the military. So instead of getting frustrated that "The Military" hasn't done anything yet, why are we not getting frustrated that TRUMP hasn't done anything yet?

I see many people mention that Trump can't be seen to be directing the military, that for optics he needs to be seen to be neutral. But those optics would be for the normies who aren't aware of these things. WE don't need those optics, because we Obviously understand the optics and realize that Trump is the one controlling the military. Yet we still play this game of blaming "The Military" instead of Trump.

And how would it be explained to the rest of the world who the US military was being controlled by? Who would be the living, breathing person that would be recognized as the Commander of the US Military whenever "The Military" mobilizes and does whatever it is it's supposed to do to right all these wrongs? What is that person's name?

I feel like much of this is like a dog chasing its tail, with people being frustrated by "The Military" doing nothing, while knowing that the US military absolutely 100% would be under the directive of Trump, but having to pretend that Trump wasn't in control of the military because we need to maintain optics for the normies....of which we are not part of.

So what I'm taking a long time to say is, are we simply frustrated not with "The Military" but with Trump, but are simply too scared to say it? Or feel guilty to say it?

Or is there some other logical explanation for it? Other than it's part of The Plan and we have to Trust in the Plan? Because for me that just opens up a whole 'nother can of beans.

Thanks for taking the time to read this and again, I would appreciate any insight that could be given.

Fair Warning: Long, boring, somewhat rambling post to follow:

I would really appreciate some help understanding something, and I mean this sincerely and not as a means to doom or start an argument or anything of that nature. This is something that has bothered me since I first learned about Q and started coming here.

Why do people speak of the military as if it's an autonomous entity and can DO anything on its own? A living, breathing, human being is required to orchestrate the actions of the military.

If we're going by the US Constitution, then the US military is under the command of the sitting President of the United States. Obviously Biden is not going to do anything of the nature of directing the military to act against him.

So the next alternative is the one that is mentioned the most around here and that is Trump is still secretly in control of the military. So instead of getting frustrated that "The Military" hasn't done anything yet, why are we not getting frustrated that TRUMP hasn't done anything yet?

I see many people mention that Trump can't be seen to be directing the military, that for optics he needs to be seen to be neutral. But those optics would be for the normies who aren't aware if these things. WE don't need those optics, because we Obviously understand the optics and realize that Trump is the one controlling the military. Yet we still play this game of blaming "The Military" instead of Trump.

And how would it be explained to the rest of the world who the US military was being controlled by? Who would be the living, breathing person that would be recognized as the Commander-In-Chief of the US Military whenever "The Military" mobilizes and does whatever it is it's supposed to do to right all these wrongs? What is that person's name?

I feel like much of this is like a dog chasing its tail, with people being frustrated by "The Military" doing nothing, while knowing that the US military absolutely 100% would be under the directive of Trump, but having to pretend that Trump wasn't in control of the military because we need to maintain optics for the normies....of which we are not part of.

So what I'm taking a long time to say is, are we simply frustrated not with "The Military" but with Trump, but are simply too scared to say it? Or feel guilty to say it?

Or is there some other logical explanation for it? Other than it's part of The Plan and we have to Trust in the Plan? Because for me that just opens up a whole 'nother can of beans.

Thanks for taking the time to read this and again, I would appreciate any insight that could be given.

Fair Warning: Long, boring, somewhat rambling post to follow:

I would really appreciate some help understanding something, and I mean this sincerely and not as a means to doom or start an argument or anything of that nature. This is something that has bothered me since I first learned about Q and started coming here.

Why do people speak of the military as if it's an autonomous entity and can DO anything on its own?

If we're going by the US Constitution, then the US military is under the command of the sitting President of the United States. Obviously Biden is not going to do anything of the nature of directing the military to act against him.

So the next alternative is the one that is mentioned the most around here and that is Trump is still secretly in control of the military. So instead of getting frustrated that "The Military" hasn't done anything yet, why are we not getting frustrated that TRUMP hasn't done anything yet?

I see many people mention that Trump can't be seen to be directing the military, that for optics he needs to be seen to be neutral. But those optics would be for the normies who aren't aware if these things. WE don't need those optics, because we Obviously understand the optics and realize that Trump is the one controlling the military. Yet we still play this game of blaming "The Military" instead of Trump.

And how would it be explained to the rest of the world who the US military was being controlled by? Who would be the living, breathing person that would be recognized as the Commander-In-Chief of the US Military whenever "The Military" mobilizes and does whatever it is it's supposed to do to right all these wrongs? What is that person's name?

I feel like much of this is like a dog chasing its tail, with people being frustrated by "The Military" doing nothing, while knowing that the US military absolutely 100% would be under the directive of Trump, but having to pretend that Trump wasn't in control of the military because we need to maintain optics for the normies....of which we are not part of.

So what I'm taking a long time to say is, are we simply frustrated not with "The Military" but with Trump, but are simply too scared to say it? Or feel guilty to say it?

Or is there some other logical explanation for it? Other than it's part of The Plan and we have to Trust in the Plan? Because for me that just opens up a whole 'nother can of beans.

Thanks for taking the time to read this and again, I would appreciate any insight that could be given.