Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

A lot of words to try and talk over me and come off as pseudo-intellectual, but still no acknowledgment that creating a dish does not ever make one a chef. Formal training is literally the PRIMARY defining quality of a chef. It’s not having the ability to create dishes, that’s just something that happens to come with a formal training that anyone, even and especially untrained cooks, could be able to do. I’ve worked under cooks who developed the recipes on the menu themselves, it never made them into chefs.

For everyone like me that cares enough to speak up, there are many more staying silent because they don’t see it as worthwhile for them to contend. It’s foolish to assume you aren’t losing anyone by prefacing your entire post with a falsehood simply because no one else is speaking up.

I actually didn’t realize that personalities and influencers was another analogy, I thought you were saying that was part of their definition because it was stated in the midst of you attempting to define the distinction, and you stated it as an absolute not as a likeness. That analogy I can mostly agree with because it fits with chefs overseeing other cooks, despite personalities not typically having formal training to become personalities.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

A lot of words to try and talk over me and come off as pseudo-intellectual, but still no acknowledgment that creating a dish does not ever make one a chef. Formal training is literally the PRIMARY defining quality of a chef. It’s not having the ability to create dishes, that’s just something that happens to come with a formal training that anyone, even and especially untrained cooks, could be able to do. I’ve worked under “cooks” who developed the recipes on the menu themselves, it never made them into chefs.

For everyone like me that cares enough to speak up, there are many more staying silent because they don’t see it as worthwhile for them to contend. It’s foolish to assume you aren’t losing anyone by prefacing your entire post with a falsehood simply because no one else is speaking up.

I actually didn’t realize that personalities and influencers was another analogy, I thought you were saying that was part of their definition because it was stated in the midst of you attempting to define the distinction, and you stated it as an absolute not as a likeness. That analogy I can mostly agree with because it fits with chefs overseeing other cooks, despite personalities not typically having formal training to become personalities.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

A lot of words to try and talk over me and come off as pseudo-intellectual, but still no acknowledgment that creating a dish does not ever make one a chef. Formal training is literally the PRIMARY defining quality of a chef. It’s not having the ability to create dishes, that’s just something that happens to come with a formal training that anyone, even and especially untrained cooks, could be able to do. I’ve workers under “cooks” who developed the recipes on the menu themselves, it never made them into chefs.

For everyone like me that cares enough to speak up, there are many more staying silent because they don’t see it as worthwhile for them to contend. It’s foolish to assume you aren’t losing anyone by prefacing your entire post with a falsehood simply because no one else is speaking up.

I actually didn’t realize that personalities and influencers was another analogy, I thought you were saying that was part of their definition because it was stated in the midst of you attempting to define the distinction, and you stated it as an absolute not as a likeness. That analogy I can mostly agree with because it fits with chefs overseeing other cooks, despite personalities not typically having formal training to become personalities.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

A lot of words to try and talk over me and come off as pseudo-intellectual, but still no acknowledgment that creating a dish does not ever make one a chef. Formal training is literally the PRIMARY defining quality of a chef. It’s not having the ability to create dishes, that’s just something that happens to come with a formal training that anyone could be able to do.

For everyone like me that cares enough to speak up, there are many more staying silent because they don’t see it as worthwhile for them to contend. It’s foolish to assume you aren’t losing anyone by prefacing your entire post with a falsehood simply because no one else is speaking up.

I actually didn’t realize that personalities and influencers was another analogy, I thought you were saying that was part of their definition because it was stated in the midst of you attempting to define the distinction, and you stated it as an absolute not as a likeness. That analogy I can mostly agree with because it fits with chefs overseeing other cooks, despite personalities not typically having formal training to become personalities.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

A lot of words to try and talk over me and come off as pseudo-intellectual, but still no acknowledgment that creating a dish does not ever make one a chef. Formal training is literally the PRIMARY DEFINITION of a chef. Not having the ability to create dishes, it’s just something that happens to come with the formal training.

For everyone like me that cares enough to speak up, there are many more staying silent because they don’t see it as worthwhile for them to contend. It’s foolish to assume you aren’t losing anyone by prefacing your entire post with a falsehood simply because no one else is speaking up.

I actually didn’t realize that personalities and influencers was another analogy, I though you were saying that was part of their definition because it was stated in the midst of you attempting to define the distinction. That analogy I can agree with because it fits with chefs overseeing other cooks.

2 years ago
1 score