Well your argument sure devolved to the perspective of a failed disgruntled basement teenager quick.

I never argued accreditation actually makes you guaranteed to be satisfactory in the position, but it does give you the title of the position, because that title literally means you gained the accreditation. Otherwise you’re considered a head cook if unaccredited and while in the same position as a head chef. Of course a cook could be more capable than a chef, but the difference is still explicit.

Words matter. We use them for a reason despite what you and liberals seem to think.

Well your argument sure devolved to the perspective of a failed disgruntled basement teenager quick.

I never argued accreditation actually makes you guaranteed to be satisfactory in the position, but it does give you the title of the position, because that title literally means you gained the accreditation. Otherwise you’re considered a head cook if unaccredited and while in the same position as a head chef. Of course a cook could be more capable than a chef, but the difference is still explicit.

Words matter.

Well your argument sure devolved to the perspective of a failed disgruntled basement teenager quick.

I never argued accreditation actually makes you guaranteed to be satisfactory in the position, but it does give you the title of the position, because that title literally means you gained the accreditation. Otherwise you’re considered a head cook if unaccredited and while in the same position as a head chef.

Words matter.

Well your argument sure devolved to the perspective of a failed disgruntled basement teenager quick.

I never argued accreditation actually makes you guaranteed to be satisfactory in the position, but it does give you the title of the position, because that title literally means you gained the accreditation. Otherwise you’re considered a head cook when in the same position as a chef.

Words matter.

Well your argument sure devolved to the perspective of a failed disgruntled basement teenager quick.

I never argued accreditation actually makes you guaranteed to be satisfactory in the position, but it does give you the title of the position, because that title literally means you gained the accreditation. Otherwise you’re considered a head cook in the same position as a chef.

Words matter.

Well your argument sure devolved to the perspective of a failed disgruntled basement teenager quick.

I never argued accreditation actually makes you guaranteed to be satisfactory in the position, but it does give you the title of the position, because that title literally means you gained the accreditation. Otherwise you’re just a head cook in the same position as a chef.

Words matter.

Well your argument sure devolved to the perspective of a failed disgruntled basement teenager quick.

I never argued accreditation actually makes you qualified, but it does give you the title, because that title literally means you gained the accreditation.

Words matter.