you clearly have absolutely no idea what titles mean or why they were ever made.

Doesn't matter what I think, since I'm not accredited enough to have an opinion.

You're just like those freaks on twitter who think a blue check mark makes their opinions more valid.

Doctors didn't have to be accredited until the Rockefellers said you did. Until then, titles just denoted occupation -- nothing more and nothing less.

most agree that the difference lies in education and experience.

Define "education"

Define "accreditation"

Define "training"

Define "experience"

Define "formal"

If it varies at all, then being a chef means someone calls you a chef as your occupation, nothing more and nothing less.

You are obsessed with semantics. You're in a semantic fantasy land.

you are typically considered a chef

you are almost always considered a cook.

They don't seem all that convinced of their own definitions, huh?

Chef, based on etymology, is one who leads a kitchen. Root word, Chief -- leader or head.

You are arguing semantics. You will not win, I will not win.

You need to understand that people can have opinions other than you. No institution of man can validate your opinion and force reality to bend to your whim.

You're infantile and a waste of time.

Why did you even bother then? Because you can't accept that there is someone who doesn't share in your opinion? Come down off your high horse.

you clearly have absolutely no idea what titles mean or why they were ever made.

Doesn't matter what I think, since I'm not accredited enough to have an opinion.

You're just like those freaks on twitter who think a blue check mark makes their opinions more valid.

Doctors didn't have to be accredited until the Rockefellers said you did. Until then, titles just denoted occupation -- nothing more and nothing less.

most agree that the difference lies in education and experience.

Define "education"

Define "accreditation"

Define "training"

Define "experience"

Define "formal"

If it varies at all, then being a chef means someone calls you a chef, nothing more and nothing less.

You are obsessed with semantics. You're in a semantic fantasy land.

you are typically considered a chef

you are almost always considered a cook.

They don't seem all that convinced of their own definitions, huh?

Chef, based on etymology, is one who leads a kitchen. Root word, Chief -- leader or head.

You are arguing semantics. You will not win, I will not win.

You need to understand that people can have opinions other than you. No institution of man can validate your opinion and force reality to bend to your whim.

You're infantile and a waste of time.

Why did you even bother then? Because you can't accept that there is someone who doesn't share in your opinion? Come down off your high horse.