If you read again the only 1 line I posted you will notice the condition:
Exactly. You coupled "I won't trust Elon .... until (without) condition N"
That's what I'm saying. It almost implies that if Elon DOES to N, you WILL trust him, which to my mind is ALSO a false approach. You don't NEED to trust Elon at all, in any thing. Let Elon be Elon, and do what You need to do.
That said, I think we are in some basic agreement. Yet, to be honest, I have a critical view of some practices I see among some anons. That's what I'm reacting to here. (sorry, but I do.)
Allow me to sum up my view re: hopium.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/H0UW5XF9.png
I don't do hopium. I do hopermectin.
Hopium is like a narcotic. Not good. Antithetical to the Q approach, imo.
Hopium is not faith. It's pseudo-faith.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaJGjfd/turn-off-the-hopium-ingest-the-h/
The whole "anon's" interaction with, or digestion of, hopium is problematic from my viewpoint. It perfectly illustrates a condition where anons are NOT applying Q's methods of using logical thinking, expanded thinking, empirical data and information. It's like drunk driving as opposed to cautious but urgent driving.
Mature faith means faith with understanding. If you're fixating or ingesting hopium, it means you need to grow more and become more robust.
I know that not everyone is there. We're all at different points in the journey. And, yes, in the difficult moments between Nov 3 and Jan 30, I ingested lots of hopium. But after a 4-month hangover, I realized: Hopium is crack. Hopermectin works with your mental and spiritual system to reinforce your natural immunity to doom.
(Hopermectin is raw useable data and verifiable/ reliable information that contributes to understanding the situation. Hopium is data and information that is not only unreliable, its data/info that triggers your emotional reaction systems because your system is low on fact-based faith. All mature faith is based on understanding.)
I think there is a strong connection between the "trust/distrust" practice and hopium ingestion. Hopium fosters distrust in the long run. Hopermectin is better!
IMO.
hth
Sorry to go on so much. But I think these points are worth making.
wwg1wga
If you read again the only 1 line I posted you will notice the condition:
Exactly. You coupled "I won't trust Elon .... until (without) condition N"
That's what I'm saying. It almost implies that if Elon DOES to N, you WILL trust him, which to my mind is ALSO a false approach. You don't NEED to trust Elon at all, in any thing. Let Elon be Elon, and do what You need to do.
That said, I think we are in some basic agreement. Yet, to be honest, I have a critical view of some practices I see among some anons. That's what I'm reacting to here. (sorry, but I do.)
Allow me to sum up my view re: hopium.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/H0UW5XF9.png
I don't do hopium. I do hopermectin.
Hopium is like a narcotic. Not good. Antithetical to the Q approach, imo.
Hopium is not faith. It's pseudo-faith.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaJGjfd/turn-off-the-hopium-ingest-the-h/
The whole "anon's" interaction with, or digestion of, hopium is problematic from my viewpoint. It perfectly illustrates a condition where anons are NOT applying Q's methods of using logical thinking, expanded thinking, empirical data and information. It's like drunk driving as opposed to cautious but urgent driving.
Mature faith means faith with understanding. If you're fixating or ingesting hopium, it means you need to grow more and become more robust.
I know that not everyone is there. We're all at different points in the journey. And, yes, in the difficult moments between Nov 3 and Jan 30, I ingested lots of hopium. But after a 4-month hangover, I realized: Hopium is crack. Hopermectin works with your mental and spiritual system to reinforce your natural immunity to doom.
now, I have an allergic reaction to both hopium and also to people ingesting hopium! (I think they ingest it and then shed it, kek)
IMO.
hth
Sorry to go on so much. But I think these points are worth making.
wwg1wga
If you read again the only 1 line I posted you will notice the condition:
Exactly. You coupled "I won't trust Elon .... until (without) condition N"
That's what I'm saying. It almost implies that if Elon DOES to N, you WILL trust him, which to my mind is ALSO a false approach. You don't NEED to trust Elon at all, in any thing. Let Elon be Elon, and do what You need to do.
That said, I think we are in some basic agreement. Yet, to be honest, I have a critical view of some practices I see among some anons. That's what I'm reacting to here. (sorry, but I do.)
Allow me to sum up my view re: hopium.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/H0UW5XF9.png
I don't do hopium. I do hopermectin.
Hopium is like a narcotic. Not good. Antithetical to the Q approach, imo.
Hopium is not faith. It's pseudo-faith.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaJGjfd/turn-off-the-hopium-ingest-the-h/
The whole "anon's" interaction with, or digestion of, hopium is problematic from my viewpoint. It perfectly illustrates a condition where anons are NOT applying Q's methods of using logical thinking, expanded thinking, empirical data and information. It's like drunk driving as opposed to cautious but urgent driving.
Mature faith means faith with understanding. If you're fixating or ingesting hopium, it means you need to grow more and become more robust.
I know that not everyone is there. We're all at different points in the journey. And, yes, in the difficult moments between Nov 3 and Jan 30, I ingested lots of hopium. But after a 4-month hangover, I realized: Hopium is crack.
now, I have an allergic reaction to both hopium and also to people ingesting hopium! (I think they ingest it and then shed it, kek)
IMO.
hth
Sorry to go on so much. But I think these points are worth making.
wwg1wga
If you read again the only 1 line I posted you will notice the condition:
Exactly. You coupled "I won't trust Elon .... until (without) condition N"
That's what I'm saying. It almost implies that if Elon DOES to N, you WILL trust him, which to my mind is ALSO a false approach. You don't NEED to trust Elon at all, in any thing. Let Elon be Elon, and do what You need to do.
That said, I think we are in some basic agreement. Yet, to be honest, I have a critical view of some practices I see among some anons. That's what I'm reacting to here. (sorry, but I do.)
Allow me to sum up my view re: hopium.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/H0UW5XF9.png
I don't do hopium. I do hopermectin.
Hopium is like a narcotic. Not good. Antithetical to the Q approach, imo.
Hopium is not faith. It's pseudo-faith.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaJGjfd/turn-off-the-hopium-ingest-the-h/
The whole "anon's" interaction with, or digestion of, hopium is problematic from my viewpoint. It perfectly illustrates a condition where anons are NOT applying Q's methods of using logical thinking, expanded thinking, empirical data and information. It's like drunk driving as opposed to cautious but urgent driving.
IMO.
hth
Sorry to go on so much. But I think these points are worth making.
wwg1wga
If you read again the only 1 line I posted you will notice the condition:
Exactly. You coupled "I won't trust Elon .... until (without) condition N"
That's what I'm saying. It almost implies that if Elon DOES to N, you WILL trust him, which to my mind is ALSO a false approach. You don't NEED to trust Elon at all, in any thing. Let Elon be Elon, and do what You need to do.
That said, I think we are in some basic agreement. Yet, to be honest, I have a critical view of some practices I see among some anons. That's what I'm reacting to here. (sorry, but I do.)
Allow me to sum up my view re: hopium.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/H0UW5XF9.png
I don't do hopium. I do hopermectin.
Hopium is like a narcotic. Not good. Antithetical to the Q approach, imo.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaJGjfd/turn-off-the-hopium-ingest-the-h/
The whole "anon's" interaction with, or digestion of, hopium is problematic from my viewpoint. It perfectly illustrates a condition where anons are NOT applying Q's methods of using logical thinking, expanded thinking, empirical data and information. It's like drunk driving as opposed to cautious but urgent driving.
IMO.
hth
Sorry to go on so much. But I think these points are worth making.
wwg1wga