from what you say it just relieves each individual who applies it.

If by that you mean that each individual must take a particular action, then that is true ... and it is ALSO true of what this woman says. No difference, in terms of the individual being responsible for their own actions.

I wouldn't be so casually dismissive of her ideas if I were you.

You really don't know what you would do if you were me. KEK. In fact, if you were me, you would do exactly what I do. Double KEK.

Just because she has "JD" behind her name doesn't impress me. No more than "MD" does, which is to say it does not.

Have I misstated her strategy? If not, then I stand by what I said: she does not understand the law on income tax.

What I got was she advocates to maximize deductions, pay "your fair share" at the end of the year, and somehow that will have some impact in some way. I don't buy it.

If I have misstated, then you should clearly state what her strategy is.

from what you say it just relieves each individual who applies it.

If by that you mean that each individual must take a particular action, then that is true ... and it is ALSO true of what this woman says. No difference, in terms of the individual being responsible for their own actions.

I wouldn't be so casually dismissive of her ideas if I were you.

You really don't know what you would do if you were me. KEK. In fact, if you were me, you would do exactly what I do. Double KEK.

Just because she has "JD" behind her name doesn't impress me. No more than "MD" does, which is to say it does not.

Have I misstated her strategy? If not, then I stand by what I said: she does not understand the law on income tax.

If I have misstated, then you should clearly state what her strategy is.