This is the typical response of a brainwashed individual I wrote about. Hysterically you proved my point.
I never wrote anything even close to ACAB. I wrote that the institutions of policing are instrumental in the problem. And you'd have to be blind and retarded to not see that.
When you take an oath to the constitution then that is the oath you take, not to the chief who serves the mayor or governor or legislators.
"NoT EvEn ClOSE To ThE ROoT Of ThE ProBLEM"
It ain't the senile old man who makes up rules that are unconstitutional whom follows the order. The police can refuse and cite that it is unconstitutional and nothing would happen. In fact, the police could educate the public in a profound manner every single time a degenerate politician or groups of them try to push unconstitutional orders by refusing to enforce and then publicly telling why. However that is extremely rare. They just follow the order then respond "doin muh jerrb".
The funny thing is, when the few exceptions don't partake unconstitutional orders, people like you praise them as heroes. But when they do and get criticized for it, people like you will turn around and say "IT'S nOT TheiR JAHhB tO InTerPRet ConStItuIOnaLITY"
You are part of the problem. You have no idea what the enemy is yet you spout retardation the second criticism is hit.
What you've done here is essentially called them "order takers" and not even realized it. It's the result of years of brainwashing.
Police will be the ones who come to your door when the system says "no more guns". Not Nancy Pelosi. Here's a convo between you and the goons in blue
You: This is unconstitutional!
Goons: I'm just doing my job
You: You took an oath to the Constitution so help you God
Goons: I'm just doing my job
You: But I defended you when they told me you were part of the problem
Goons: Break the door down and take em all
This is the typical response of a brainwashed individual I wrote about. Hysterically you proved my point.
I never wrote anything even close to ACAB. I wrote that the institutions of policing are instrumental in the problem. And you'd have to be blind and retarded to not see that.
When you take an oath to the constitution then that is the oath you take, not to the chief who serves the mayor or governor or legislators.
"NoT EvEn ClOSE To ThE ROoT Of ThE ProBLEM"
It ain't the senile old man who makes up rules that are unconstitutional whom follows the order. The police can refuse and cite that it is unconstitutional and nothing would happen. In fact, the police could educate the public in a profound manner every single time a degenerate politician or groups of them try to push unconstitutional orders by refusing to enforce and then publicly telling why. However that is extremely rare. They just follow the order then respond "doin muh jerrb".
The funny thing is, when the few exceptions don't partake unconstitutional orders, people like you praise them as heroes. But when they do and get criticized for it, people like you will turn around and say "IT'S nOT TheiR JAHhB tO InTerPRet ConStItuIOnaLITY"
You are part of the problem. You have no idea what the enemy is yet you spout retardation the second criticism is hit.
What you've done here is essentially called them "order takers" and not even realized it. It's the result of years of brainwashing.
This is the typical response of a brainwashed individual I wrote about. Hysterically you proved my point.
I never wrote anything even close to ACAB. I wrote that the institutions of policing are instrumental in the problem. And you'd have to be blind and retarded to not see that.
When you take an oath to the constitution then that is the oath you take, not to the chief who serves the mayor or governor or legislators.
"NoT EvEn ClOSE To ThE ROoT Of ThE ProBLEM"
It ain't the senile old man who makes up rules that are unconstitutional whom follows the order. The police can refuse and cite that it is unconstitutional and nothing would happen. In fact, the police could educate the public in a profound manner every single time a degenerate politician or groups of them try to push unconstitutional orders by refusing to enforce and then publicly telling why. However that is extremely rare. They just follow the order then respond "doin muh jerrb".
You are part of the problem. You have no idea what the enemy is yet you spout retardation the second criticism is hit.
What you've done here is essentially called them "order takers" and not even realized it. It's the result of years of brainwashing.
This is the typical response of a brainwashed individual I wrote about. Hysterically you proved my point.
I never wrote anything even close to ACAB. I wrote that the institutions of policing are instrumental in the problem. And you'd have to be blind and retarded to not see that.
When you take an oath to the constitution then that is the oath you take, not to the chief who serves the mayor or governor or legislators.
"NoT EvEn ClOSE To ThE ROoT Of ThE ProBLEM"
It ain't the senile old man who makes up rules that are unconstitutional whom follows the order. The police can refuse and cite that it is unconstitutional and nothing would happen.
You are part of the problem. You have no idea what the enemy is yet you spout retardation the second criticism is hit.
What you've done here is essentially called them "order takers" and not even realized it. It's the result of years of brainwashing.