The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security. Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
It's quite brilliant. If they decide against it, military is the only way and ALL should be removed from office that violated their oath.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security. Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html?fbclid=IwAR0OKVlapmCGMbE4MZqJ78AA4fv2jSpH8LEozBamL_2oFebW8Yjy49-SWWE It's quite brilliant. If they decide against it, military is the only way and ALL should be removed from office that violated their oath.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security. Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
It's quite brilliant. If they decide against it, military is the only way and ALL should be removed from office that violated their oath.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security. Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
It's quite brilliant. If they decide against it, military is the only way and ALL should be removed from office that violated their oath.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security. Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
It's quite brilliant. If they decide against it, military is the only way.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security. Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is strictly about the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..."