While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.

Take for example Birth Control (since I'm currently working on that). According to the official history, Margaret Sanger was arrested and harassed, mostly by the NY Police department. This harassment, her arrests and eventual jail in the NY police corrections are stated as having been the best thing for her movement (according to official history). This last action in particular (imprisonment) brought huge attention to her movement and caused great sympathy for "the underdog," poor Ms. Margaret Sanger, who was just trying to help people and increase women's freedom.

As it turns out, the person who was in charge of the Jail system in NY at the time Sanger was arrested was, just a couple years later, appointed head of the Bureau of Social Hygiene by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This is the stated funding source for Sanger that eventually kicked off her superstardom. While I can't find direct evidence for it, the NY Police department was almost certainly under Rockefeller control at the time as well. It was well known as corrupt. Since I have shown that Rockefeller owned the entirety of New York at the time, his rulership of the Police is almost certain.

This is just one connection between Sanger and Rockefeller that suggests they were in opposition, when in fact they were besties. The Sanger-Rockefeller relationship is just one example of such "Opposition."

I'm not speaking on the Musk thing or his Neurolink. Personally I'm a fan of both, but am wary about everything. My suggestion is never to assume that just because entities appear to be in opposition, that they actually are. Most of the time (almost all of the time), according to my investigation, they are not really in opposition, but are intended to create that illusion to change the beliefs of an otherwise wary populace. Controlled Opposition is one of the most useful tools for changing our beliefs. It is one of the primary traps of The Matrix (and every con game). Be on the lookout for it at all times in your investigations.

While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.

Take for example Birth Control (since I'm currently working on that). According to the official history, Margaret Sanger was arrested and harassed, mostly by the NY Police department. This harassment, her arrests and eventual jail in the NY police corrections are stated as having been the best thing for her movement (according to official history). This last action in particular (imprisonment) brought huge attention to her movement and caused great sympathy for "the underdog," poor Ms. Margaret Sanger, who was just trying to help people and increase women's freedom.

As it turns out, the person who was in charge of the Jail system in NY at the time Sanger was arrested was, just a couple years later appointed head of the Bureau of Social Hygiene, by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This is the stated funding source for Sanger that eventually kicked off her superstardom. While I can't find direct evidence for it, the NY Police department was almost certainly under Rockefeller control at the time as well. It was well known as corrupt. Since I have shown that Rockefeller owned the entirety of New York at the time, his rulership of the Police is almost certain.

This is just one connection between Sanger and Rockefeller that suggests they were in opposition, when in fact they were besties. The Sanger-Rockefeller relationship is just one example of such "Opposition."

I'm not speaking on the Musk thing or his Neurolink. Personally I'm a fan of both, but am wary about everything. My suggestion is never to assume that just because entities appear to be in opposition, that they actually are. Most of the time (almost all of the time), according to my investigation, they are not really in opposition, but are intended to create that illusion to change the beliefs of an otherwise wary populace. Controlled Opposition is one of the most useful tools for changing our beliefs. It is one of the primary traps of The Matrix (and every con game). Be on the lookout for it at all times in your investigations.

While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.

Take for example Birth Control (since I'm currently working on that). According to the official history, Margaret Sanger was arrested and harassed, mostly by the NY Police department. This harassment, her arrests and eventual jail in the NY police corrections are stated as having been the best thing for her movement (according to official history). This last action in particular (imprisonment) brought huge attention to her movement and caused great sympathy for "the underdog," poor Ms. Margaret Sanger, who was just trying to help people and increase women's freedom.

As it turns out, the person who was in charge of the Jail system in NY at the time Sanger was arrested was, just a couple years later appointed head of the Bureau of Social Hygiene, by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This is the stated funding source for Sanger that eventually kicked off her superstardom. While I can't find direct evidence for it, the NY Police department was almost certainly under Rockefeller control at the time as well. It was well known as corrupt. Since I have shown that Rockefeller owned the entirety of New York at the time, his rulership of the Police is almost certain.

This is just one connection between Sanger and Rockefeller that suggests they were in opposition, when in fact they were besties. The Sanger-Rockefeller relationship is just one example of such "Opposition."

I'm not speaking on the Musk thing or his Neurolink. Personally I'm a fan of both, but am wary about everything. My suggestion is never to assume that just because entities appear to be in opposition, that they actually are. Most of the time (almost all of the time), according to my investigation, they are not really in opposition, but are intended to create that illusion to push a belief on the populace. Controlled Opposition is one of the most useful traps of The Matrix (and every con game). Be on the lookout for it at all times in your investigations.

While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.

Take for example Birth Control (since I'm currently working on that). According to the official history, Margaret Sanger was arrested and harassed, mostly by the NY Police department. This harassment, her arrests and eventual jail in the NY police corrections are stated as having been the best thing for her movement (according to official history). This last action in particular (imprisonment) brought huge attention to her movement and caused great sympathy for "the underdog," poor Ms. Margaret Sanger, who was just trying to help people and increase women's freedom.

As it turns out, the person who was in charge of the Jail system in NY at the time Sanger was arrested was, just a couple years later appointed head of the Bureau of Social Hygiene, by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This is the stated funding source for Sanger that eventually kicked off her superstardom. While I can't find direct evidence for it, the NY Police department was almost certainly under Rockefeller control at the time as well. It was well known as corrupt. Since I have shown that Rockefeller owned the entirety of New York at the time, his rulership of the Police is almost certain.

This is just one connection between Sanger and Rockefeller that suggests they were in opposition, when in fact they were besties. The Sanger-Rockefeller relationship is just one example of such "Opposition."

I'm not speaking on the Musk thing or his Neurolink. Personally I'm a fan of both, but am wary about everything. My suggestion is never to assume that just because entities appear to be in opposition, that they actually are. Most of the time (almost all of the time), according to my investigation, they never really are. Controlled Opposition is one of the most useful traps of The Matrix (and every con game). Be on the lookout for it at all times in your investigations.

While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.

Take for example Birth Control (since I'm currently working on that). According to the official history, Margaret Sanger was arrested and harassed, mostly by the NY Police department. This harassment, her arrests and eventual jail in the NY police corrections are stated as having been the best thing for her movement (according to official history). This last action in particular (imprisonment) brought huge attention to her movement and caused great sympathy for "the underdog," poor Ms. Margaret Sanger, who was just trying to help people and increase women's freedom.

As it turns out, the person who was in charge of the Jail system in NY at the time Sanger was arrested was, just a couple years later appointed head of the Bureau of Social Hygiene, by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This is the stated funding source for Sanger that eventually kicked off her superstardom. While I can't find direct evidence for it, the NY Police department was almost certainly under Rockefeller control at the time as well. It was well known as corrupt. Since I have shown that Rockefeller owned the entirety of New York at the time, his rulership of the Police is almost certain.

This is just one connection between Sanger and Rockefeller that suggests they were in opposition, when in fact they were besties. The Sanger-Rockefeller relationship is just one example of such "Opposition."

I'm not speaking on the Musk thing or his Neurolink. Personally I'm a fan of both, but wary about everything. My suggestion is never to assume that just because entities appear to be in opposition, that they actually are. Most of the time (almost all of the time), according to my investigation, they never really are. Controlled Opposition is one of the most useful traps of The Matrix (and every con game). Be on the lookout for it at all times in your investigations.