Does anyone have the link to the argument "Jikky" made?

I've seen multiple "debunks" of this study from our side but honestly haven't come across one that washes with the data.

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext#%20

The study was driven by data from Ontario (pop. 14,789,778) and the study analyzed 11,270,763 of them. Of that 11 million or so people, 9,425,473 had received the vaccine.

In the 18-39 age range, 3,000,000 had received the vaccine and 938,000 hadn't.

So unless there was more nuance to what Jikky was arguing than presented here by @freenemo, their analysis is incorrect.

EDIT: And to follow up (I'm digging on it some more), another thing that is impressive on this study is it's probably the only cabal vaccine study I've seen that doesn't treat one dose as "unvaccinated":

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext#seccesectitle0034

Does anyone have the link to the argument "Jikky" made?

I've seen multiple "debunks" of this study from our side but honestly haven't come across one that washes with the data.

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext#%20

The study was driven by data from Ontario (pop. 14,789,778) and the study analyzed 11,270,763 of them. Of that 11 million or so people, 9,425,473 had received the vaccine.

In the 18-39 age range, 3,000,000 had received the vaccine and 938,000 hadn't.

So unless there was more nuance to what Jikky was arguing than presented here by @freenemo, their analysis is incorrect.