Reason: None provided.
And? Whistleblower testimony alone is not going to be enough to move the judge on this. They need to empirically show that what he's saying actually happened, included fraudulent ballots, and included enough fraudulent ballots to change the outcome of the election.
Uphill battle.
2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original
And? Whistleblower testimony alone is not going to be enough to move the judge on this. They need to empirically show that what he's saying actually happened, included fraudulent ballots, and included enough fraudulent ballots to change the outcome of the election.
Uphill battle.
2 years ago
1 score