I hear what you're saying. But I was responding more to the principle that "morals come from within."

Once this conclusion has been arrived at, then there are no objective moral grounds to judge Pedophilia as morally wrong, because, subjectively, the "Pedophile makes his own morals."

Ultimately, if there are objective moral laws which society's everywhere follow, then there is an Objective Moral Law Giver (God). There appears to be objective moral laws (even a serial killer would feel "wronged" if his mother were to be brutally murdered). This sense of morality appears to transcend individuality and societal constructs. Therefore, there are objective moral laws - which leads us to a transcendent moral law Giver - God.

I hear what you're saying. But I was responding more to the principle that "morals come from within."

Once this conclusion has been arrived at, then there are no objective moral grounds to judge Pedophilia as morally wrong, because, ultimately, the "Pedophile makes his own morals."

Ultimately, if there are objective moral laws which society's everywhere follow, then there is an Objective Moral Law Giver (God). There appears to be objective moral laws (even a serial killer would feel "wronged" if his mother were to be brutally murdered). This sense of morality appears to transcend individuality and societal constructs. Therefore, there are objective moral laws - which leads us to a transcendent moral law Giver - God.

I hear what you're saying. But I was responding more to the principle that "morals come from within."

Once this conclusion has been arrived at, then there are no objective moral grounds to judge Pedophilia as morally wrong, because, ultimately, the "Pedophile makes his own morals."

Ultimately, if there is an Objective Moral Law, then there is an Objective Moral Law Giver (God).