Now this is a very important win, or is it? Even though the fine is not the original $300,000, he still has to pay a $55,000 for what? Does this imply he is guilty? I hope it is a win for food freedom.

The more I read the less I see this as a win. The judge has set a 'stay' and 'abeyance' meaning it can be reactivated, especially if the $55,000 is not paid. This appears to be just more government shakedown of ordinary citizens.

Earlier this year armed federal agents raided his property after 30 years of operation without harassment or notification. I never understood how federal regulations have any enforcement under law. A regulation is a policy set into place to regulate 'something'. It is not a legislative process and therefore is not lawful. Laws require the consent of the people through their legislature.

Now this is a very important win, or is it? Even though the fine is not the original $300,000, he still has to pay a $55,000 for what? Does this imply he is guilty? I hope it is a win for food freedom.

Now this is a very important win or is it? Even though the fine is not the original $300,000, he still has to pay a $55,000 for what? Does this imply he is guilty? I hope it is a win for food freedom.

Now this is a very important win. Bravo to the win for food freedom.