I have another question (and yes I agree that the word "intent" is not even in the Arizona law in question)...

Should not the plaintiff's attorney have immediately appealed the judge's decision to throw out 3 of the original 5 (8 out of 10?) causes of action? Does that lack of objection now make these issues moot on appeal? Because those causes of action were all very determinative.

I have another question (and yes I agree that the word "intent" is not even in the Arizona law in question)...

Should not the plaintiff's attorney have immediately appealed the judge's decision to throw out 3 of the original 5 (8 out of 10?) causes of action? Does that lack of objection now make these issue moot on appeal? Because those causes of action were all very determinative.