Except that, ""the restored government of VA in exile in Richmond"", was NOT in Richmond,
Please don't misquote. That's not what I said. What I actually said was:
the restored government of VA in exile from the capitol of Richmond
Quite the different meaning when quoted correctly. Dare I suggest that this misquote was intentional...
was NOT in Richmond
The location of the body's meeting does not determine its legitimacy or illegitimacy.
was Not a duly elected Govt
Free and open elections were held. A governor was elected by those choosing to vote in that election. The rebels held their own elections as well, which the US government rightly refused to recognize, and instead lawfully recognized the "restored government" as the legitimate governing body under the Constitution.
was in hiding in Wheeling
Was in exile, forced there following threats of violence by rebels
it was a RUMP GOVT, unelected
Again, free and open elections were held
making them a bunch of Seditionists, at best, and LIARS too
Sure, rebels would certainly levy that charge to distract from their own crimes.
At MOST Only two counties should have been admitted as the Entire State of WV, not the gargantuan piece of land that Virginia never approved,
How can you concede that any should have been admitted if as you argue, it was unconstitutional? Not wise to undermine your own core argument. The restored government of VA did approve all the counties involved in the petition, though there was unsual delay given the extraordinary circumstances resulting from the ongoing rebellion which you delusionally claim didn't exist.
Claim that you believe the Constitution is Law,
Because it is. Are you suggesting it isn't?
and in it, the FIRST ONE to approve the splitting of a State is supposed to be the Elected Valid Govt,
That's not what the text says. And we're not talking about a state "splitting up." That's not any of the cases described by the text of Article in question. This is actually a 10th Amendment issue, as to the right of a state to cede part of its land to the federal government and/or the right of the state to grant permission for counties within it to secede from it to petition from statehood. The Constitution does not forbid a state from such action. It does however, set restrictions on how the federal government can approve new admission of new states, which as I've already detailed several times, none of these prohibitions were violated. Again, because of the semicolon, the case we're dealing with doesn't even technically involve the state government at all, except insofar as its exercising its 10th Amendment right to permit counties to secede from it.
throwing out this BS in Exile BS, which Never Happened, it was just a bunch of asshole FreeMasons claiming the status that they Never Had....
The irony of the delusion expressed in this statement is as staggering as your refusal to admit that you were duped by Lost Causists into supporting a rebellion made in defense of an evil cause. One might wonder if you're really a reincarnation of Jefferson Davis...
Except that, ""the restored government of VA in exile in Richmond"", was NOT in Richmond,
Please don't misquote. That's not what I said. What I actually said was:
the restored government of VA in exile from the capitol of Richmond
Quite the different meaning when quoted correctly. Dare I suggest that this misquote was intentional...
was NOT in Richmond
The location of the body's meeting does not determine its legitimacy or illegitimacy.
was Not a duly elected Govt
Free and open elections were held. A governor was elected by those choosing to vote in that election. The rebels held their own elections as well, which the US government rightly refused to recognize, and instead lawfully recognized the "restored government" as the legitimate governing body under the Constitution.
was in hiding in Wheeling
Was in exile, forced there following threats of violence by rebels
it was a RUMP GOVT, unelected
Again, free and open elections were held
making them a bunch of Seditionists, at best, and LIARS too
Sure, rebels would certainly levy that charge to distract from their own crimes.
At MOST Only two counties should have been admitted as the Entire State of WV, not the gargantuan piece of land that Virginia never approved,
How can you concede that any should have been admitted if as you argue, it was unconstitutional? Not wise to undermine your own core argument. The restored government of VA did approve all the counties involved in the petition, though there was unsual delay given the extraordinary circumstances resulting from the ongoing rebellion which you delusionally claim didn't exist.
Claim that you believe the Constitution is Law,
Because it is. Are you suggesting it isn't?
and in it, the FIRST ONE to approve the splitting of a State is supposed to be the Elected Valid Govt,
That's not what the text says. And we're not talking about a state "splitting up." That's not any of the cases described by the text of Article in question. This is actually a 10th Amendment issue, as to the right of a state to cede part of its land to the federal government and/or the right of the state to grant permission for counties within it to secede from it to petition from statehood. The Constitution does not forbid a state from such action. It does however, set restrictions on how the federal government can approve new admission of new states, which as I've already detailed several times, none of these prohibitions were violated. Again, because of the semicolon, the case we're dealing with doesn't even technically involve the state government at all, except insofar as its exercising its 10th Amendment right to permit counties to secede from it.
throwing out this BS in Exile BS, which Never Happened, it was just a bunch of asshole FreeMasons claiming the status that they Never Had....
The irony of the delusion expressed in this statement is as staggering as your refusal to admit that you were duped by Lost Causists into supporting a rebellion made in defense of an evil cause. One might wonder if you're really a reincarnation of JeffersonDavis...so