"Your analysis is logical and exactly what I expect on this board."

Thanks, you seem to be a voice from the deep wilderness. In my over 2 years being on GAW, I've never taken such a beating as I have on posting on IMHO of the lack of evidence it was from the clot shot. Lesson learned. TGP is priming the pump on this too. The commentary is PROOF! It's the CLOT SHOT! Well, maybe they are right after all. I can no longer find the video that had the angle I saw of the hit that sent me down this maligned and ridiculed road I took. In this video it appears like it wasn't a hit to the helmet as I claimed earlier, but rather an ordinary appearing shoulder-to-chest contact and tackle. From the other video, it sure looked like the Bengal's player made head to head contact. I watched the game and saw the play. This doctor says it could have been chest trauma. I don't agree with him necessarily, but it is a valid theory. In addition, I once knew a dad, who's son died as a result of a line drive baseball hitting him in the chest. It stopped his heart and killed him. Shit like this can happen, I suppose.

I found out very quickly I was out of favor for my IMHO. Still, there is no precedent for this injury occurring in the NFL. That was my point and I didn't want make a premature conclusion that it was the 'clot shot'. Just remember, our enemy will undermine our over reaction and demonize us for 'misinformation'. In the end, I'm left with nothing but grasping straw.

I get your point regarding "Now they can prove it or pay." Nevertheless, this NFL injury does publicize the 'clot' shot as a possible cause. From this vantage point, it is helpful for making people aware and asking questions like - How can this happen? Hmmmm...... clot shot?

"Your analysis is logical and exactly what I expect on this board."

Thanks, you seem to be a voice from the deep wilderness. In my over 2 years being on GAW, I've never taken such a beating as I have on posting on IMHO of the lack of evidence it was from the clot shot. TGP is priming the pump on this too. The commentary is PROOF! It's the CLOT SHOT! Well, maybe they are right after all. I can no longer find the video that had the angle I saw of the hit that sent me down this maligned and ridiculed road I took. In this video it appears like it wasn't a hit to the helmet as I claimed earlier, but rather an ordinary appearing shoulder-to-chest contact and tackle. From the other video, it sure looked like the Bengal's player made head to head contact. I watched the game and saw the play. This doctor says it could have been chest trauma. I don't agree with him necessarily, but it is a valid theory. In addition, I once knew a dad, who's son died as a result of a line drive baseball hitting him in the chest. It stopped his heart and killed him. Shit like this can happen, I suppose.

I found out very quickly I was out of favor for my IMHO. Still, there is no precedent for this injury occurring in the NFL. That was my point and I didn't want make a premature conclusion that it was the 'clot shot'. Just remember, our enemy will undermine our over reaction and demonize us for 'misinformation'. In the end, I'm left with nothing but grasping straw.

I get your point regarding "Now they can prove it or pay." Nevertheless, this NFL injury does publicize the 'clot' shot as a possible cause. From this vantage point, it is helpful for making people aware and asking questions like - How can this happen? Hmmmm...... clot shot?