Those are excellent questions. I don't know, but I can give you some of my thoughts.

If I assume that the end goal is a complete rejection of the system, then the part that needs to be played by the system is to show the reasons for that rejection.

The path out (i.e. the path to a new system that truly respects individual Rights) can be encrypted (given, but not in an obvious way) within the exposure itself. I think that is exactly what is happening.

For example, The stock market fiasco that began with Gamestop is showing a path out to a truly decentralized (free) market economy.

The covid fiasco is showing a path out to a truly decentralized (free) discussion of thoughts in science and medicine.

The election steel fiasco is showing the flaws in democracy. Not just the fraud in the election itself, but the fundamental flaws in a centralized form of government (at least with respect to its role as "authority"). A part of this exposure is in showing people their inalienable Rights (because they forgot that they were important because "security"). Encoded within that exposure is that the path out must make explicit statements that any system of government (which really just means "guiding the ship" not "rule") must strictly respect individual Rights (sovereignty) above the "needs of the many."

All of the problems going on today are showing the flaws in the system. As the problems get worse, the recognition that the flaws are fundamental are exposed. Once we recognize that the flaws are fundamental, and appreciate where these systems came from, we will realize that we must reject the entire thing and build something completely different.

So yes, continuing the system has a part to play. The part it has to play is in showing just how fraudulent the system really is.

Those are excellent questions. I don't know, but I can give you some of my thoughts.

If I assume that the end goal is a complete rejection of the system, then the part that needs to be played by the system is to show the reasons for that rejection.

The path out (i.e. the path to a new system that truly respects individual Rights) can be encrypted (given, but not in an obvious way) within the exposure itself. I think that is exactly what is happening.

For example, The stock market fiasco that began with Gamestop is showing a path out to a truly decentralized (free) market economy.

The covid fiasco is showing a path out to a truly decentralized (free) discussion of thoughts in science and medicine.

The election steel fiasco is showing the flaws in democracy. Not just the fraud in the election itself, but the fundamental flaws in a centralized form of government (at least with respect to its role as "authority"). A part of this exposure is in showing people their inalienable Rights (because they forgot that they were important because "security"). Encoded within that exposure is that the path out must make explicit statements that any system of government (which really just means "guiding the ship" not "rule") must cater to the individual Right above the "needs of the many."

All of the problems going on today are showing the flaws in the system. As the problems get worse, the recognition that the flaws are fundamental are exposed. Once we recognize that the flaws are fundamental, and appreciate where these systems came from, we will realize that we must reject the entire thing and build something completely different.

So yes, continuing the system has a part to play. The part it has to play is in showing just how fraudulent the system really is.

Those are excellent questions. I don't know, but I can give you some of my thoughts.

If I assume that the end goal is a complete rejection of the system, then the part that needs to be played by the system is to show the reasons for that rejection.

The path out (i.e. the path to a new system that truly respects individual Rights) can be encrypted (given, but not in an obvious way) within the exposure itself. I think that is exactly what is happening.

For example, The stock market fiasco that began with Gamestop is showing a path out to a truly decentralized (free) market economy. The covid fiasco is showing a path out to a truly decentralized (free) discussion of thoughts in science and medicine. The election steel fiasco is showing the flaws in democracy. Not just the fraud in the election itself, but the fundamental flaws in a centralized form of government (at least with respect to its role as "authority").

All of the problems going on today are showing the flaws in the system. As the problems get worse, the recognition that the flaws are fundamental are exposed. Once we recognize that the flaws are fundamental, and appreciate where these systems came from, we will realize that we must reject the entire thing and build something completely different.

So yes, continuing the system has a part to play. The part it has to play is in showing just how fraudulent the system really is.