Re: Committees, re:votes that have to pass the Senate and/or hit the Usurper's desk, etc.:

None of this matters until something actually comes from it.

Rules package is superficial for the moment; neat, but this isn't U.S. policy.

Defunding the IRS agents -- Is that something that has to hit the Senate, or does the House have full authority over this? Also, expect challenges to come from this. It wouldn't be the first time that something looks like a win and then is twisted.

Jim Jordan heading a committee is pointless unless they actually do something with it. This requires enforcement and full utilization of the powers of the House to do so. Nunez was head of a committee and nothing was done with that.

Re: barriers and metal detectors removed; so? We knew that these were pointless anyway. No one was going to be caught dead after the 6th whether the detectors and barriers were there or not. This is virtue signaling, not some sort of substantial progress. Those were not going to be up forever and that this is a point that buys good will from you proves that.

You also forgot the conveniently removed mandates from the Pentagon.

By all means: Praise the good he's done, but don't be fooled into complacency. The Republican party has done this before, and his record is what you should be looking at first and remaining skeptical of him. If you aren't skeptical, you won't hold him to account. We desperately need accountability.

We ALL need to remember that we are giving him a chance because we've been forced to. It is not an excuse to throw all of our trust into a career politician.

Re: Committees, re:votes that have to pass the Senate and/or hit the Usurper's desk, etc.:

None of this matters until something actually comes from it.

Rules package is superficial for the moment; neat, but this isn't U.S. policy.

Defunding the IRS agents -- Is that something that has to hit the Senate, or does the House have full authority over this? Also, expect challenges to come from this. It wouldn't be the first time that something looks like a win and then is twisted.

Jim Jordan heading a committee is pointless unless they actually do something with it. This requires enforcement and full utilization of the powers of the House to do so. Nunez was head of a committee and nothing was done with that.

Re: barriers and metal detectors removed; so? We knew that these were pointless anyway. No one was going to be caught dead after the 6th whether the detectors and barriers were there or not. This is virtue signaling, not some sort of substantial progress. Those were not going to be up together, and that this is a point that buys good will from you proves that.

You also forgot the conveniently removed mandates from the Pentagon.

By all means: Praise the good he's done, but don't be fooled into complacency. The Republican party has done this before, and his record is what you should be looking at first and remaining skeptical of him. If you aren't skeptical, you won't hold him to account. We desperately need accountability.

We ALL need to remember that we are giving him a chance because we've been forced to. It is not an excuse to throw all of our trust into a career politician.

Re: Committees, re:votes that have to pass the Senate and/or hit the Usurper's desk, etc.:

None of this matters until something actually comes from it.

Rules package is superficial for the moment; neat, but this isn't U.S. policy.

Defunding the IRS agents -- Is that something that has to hit the Senate, or does the House have full authority over this? Also, expect challenges to come from this. It wouldn't be the first time that something looks like a win and then is twisted.

Jim Jordan heading a committee is pointless unless they actually do something with it. This requires enforcement and full utilization of the powers of the House to do so. Nunez was head of a committee and nothing was done with that.

Re: barriers and metal detectors removed; so? We knew that these were pointless anyway. No one was going to be caught dead after the 6th whether they detectors and barriers were there or not. This is virtue signaling, not some sort of substantial progress. Those were not going to be up together, and that this is a point that buys good will from you proves that.

You also forgot the conveniently removed mandates from the Pentagon.

By all means: Praise the good he's done, but don't be fooled into complacency. The Republican party has done this before, and his record is what you should be looking at first and remaining skeptical of him. If you aren't skeptical, you won't hold him to account. We desperately need accountability.

We ALL need to remember that we are giving him a chance because we've been forced to. It is not an excuse to throw all of our trust into a career politician.