Nixon was, imo, during his entire presidency, absolutely controlled opposition. I don't think people appreciate how much power the Cabal has. Their control is, or at least was (hopefully), total. Was Nixon always compromised? I don't know, possibly, possibly not. Some of his pre-president moves seem pretty anti-Cabal. I assert he was absolutely controlled opposition even then, I'm just not sure if he knew he was controlled opposition, though his concession to JFK in 1960 after obvious cheating suggests to me he may have known.
With controlled opposition it is difficult to tell. Once you appreciate how much controlled opposition there is however, you allow yourself to see the obvious compromises. There must be those who push agenda's against the Cabal. Since there must be those that do so, it makes sense to control them. The only obvious truth, when looking into history, is that The House Always Wins.
By the time Nixon became President however, I am (from what I've seen so far) convinced he was controlled opposition and knew it. All of his moves post-appointment were perfectly aligned with the Cabal agenda, even if they appeared to be "against."
Nixon's move to the petro-dollar was undeniably a victory for the Cabal plan. It wasn't a huge victory, it was really more like "the final nail in the coffin." Many of Nixon's moves were such. His moves in the Cold War, Vietnam, China, etc. were all Cabal victories, all completely in line with David Rockefeller's foreign agenda.
Gerald Ford, Nixon's VP, was 100% a Rockefeller crony from the get-go. He was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral commission, who made it into office with nary a vote, then appointed Nelson Rockefeller as VP, again, with nary a vote. I don't think Nelson Rockefeller ever wanted to be Pres. however. I think he was there to clean up shop in the messy C_A disclosures happening at the time, and neuter the Church Commission, both of which he accomplished. He was there to help transition out of the war with Vietnam, direct cold war efforts, and close the book on the JFK fiasco, all of which were causing so many issues with the public. He did what it took to put in the structures that would keep the C_A out of the limelight for future endeavors. He also helped finish solidifying most of the structure of government we have today with respect to social engineering (schools, health care, welfare, etc.) all of which had been started by him in the 1940s (he created the HEW e.g.). He was there to set up the necessary framework for the Carter era that followed who was also a Rockefeller (Trilateral commission) agent.
This whole analysis misses what controlled opposition is. Many of the issues can be shown to be such actions, intentioned to make it look like they are "against the Cabal," when in fact they are the opposite. So many of the actions that appear to be against, can be shown, through who is doing it, and where they are getting their funding, to be a fiction to placate the opposition, and create a false enemy.
Nixon was, imo, during his entire presidency, absolutely controlled opposition. I don't think people appreciate how much power the Cabal has. Their control is, or at least was (hopefully), total. Was Nixon always compromised? I don't know, possibly, possibly not. Some of his pre-president moves seem pretty anti-Cabal. I mean, he was absolutely controlled opposition even then, I'm just not sure if he knew he was controlled opposition, though his concession to JFK in 1960 after obvious cheating suggests to me he may have known.
With controlled opposition it is difficult to tell. Once you appreciate how much controlled opposition there is however, you allow yourself to see the obvious compromises. There must be those who push agenda's against the Cabal. Since there must be those that do so, it makes sense to control them. The only obvious truth, when looking into history, is that The House Always Wins.
By the time Nixon became President however, I am (from what I've seen so far) convinced he was controlled opposition and knew it. All of his moves post-appointment were perfectly aligned with the Cabal agenda, even if they appeared to be "against."
Nixon's move to the petro-dollar was undeniably a victory for the Cabal plan. It wasn't a huge victory, it was really more like "the final nail in the coffin." Many of Nixon's moves were such. His moves in the Cold War, Vietnam, China, etc. were all Cabal victories, all completely in line with David Rockefeller's foreign agenda.
Gerald Ford, Nixon's VP, was 100% a Rockefeller crony from the get-go. He was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral commission, who made it into office with nary a vote, then appointed Nelson Rockefeller as VP, again, with nary a vote. I don't think Nelson Rockefeller ever wanted to be Pres. however. I think he was there to clean up shop in the messy C_A disclosures happening at the time, and neuter the Church Commission, both of which he accomplished. He was there to help transition out of the war with Vietnam, direct cold war efforts, and close the book on the JFK fiasco, all of which were causing so many issues with the public. He did what it took to put in the structures that would keep the C_A out of the limelight for future endeavors. He also helped finish solidifying most of the structure of government we have today with respect to social engineering (schools, health care, welfare, etc.) all of which had been started by him in the 1940s (he created the HEW e.g.). He was there to set up the necessary framework for the Carter era that followed who was also a Rockefeller (Trilateral commission) agent.
This whole analysis misses what controlled opposition is. Many of the issues can be shown to be such actions, intentioned to make it look like they are "against the Cabal," when in fact they are the opposite. So many of the actions that appear to be against, can be shown, through who is doing it, and where they are getting their funding, to be a fiction to placate the opposition, and create a false enemy.
Nixon was, imo, absolutely controlled opposition. I don't think people appreciate how much power the Cabal has. Their control is, or at least was (hopefully), total. Was Nixon always compromised? I don't know, possibly, possibly not. Some of his pre-president moves seem pretty anti-Cabal. I mean, he was absolutely controlled opposition even then, I'm just not sure if he knew he was controlled opposition, though his concession to JFK in 1960 after obvious cheating suggests to me he may have known.
With controlled opposition it is difficult to tell. Once you appreciate how much controlled opposition there is however, you allow yourself to see the obvious compromises. There must be those who push agenda's against the Cabal. Since there must be those that do so, it makes sense to control them. The only obvious truth, when looking into history, is that The House Always Wins.
By the time Nixon became President however, I am (from what I've seen so far) convinced he was controlled opposition and knew it. All of his moves post-appointment were perfectly aligned with the Cabal agenda, even if they appeared to be "against."
Nixon's move to the petro-dollar was undeniably a victory for the Cabal plan. It wasn't a huge victory, it was really more like "the final nail in the coffin." Many of Nixon's moves were such. His moves in the Cold War, Vietnam, China, etc. were all Cabal victories, all completely in line with David Rockefeller's foreign agenda.
Gerald Ford, Nixon's VP, was 100% a Rockefeller crony from the get-go. He was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral commission, who made it into office with nary a vote, then appointed Nelson Rockefeller as VP, again, with nary a vote. I don't think Nelson Rockefeller ever wanted to be Pres. however. I think he was there to clean up shop in the messy C_A disclosures happening at the time, and neuter the Church Commission, both of which he accomplished. He was there to help transition out of the war with Vietnam, direct cold war efforts, and close the book on the JFK fiasco, all of which were causing so many issues with the public. He did what it took to put in the structures that would keep the C_A out of the limelight for future endeavors. He also helped finish solidifying most of the structure of government we have today with respect to social engineering (schools, health care, welfare, etc.) all of which had been started by him in the 1940s (he created the HEW e.g.). He was there to set up the necessary framework for the Carter era that followed who was also a Rockefeller (Trilateral commission) agent.
This whole analysis misses what controlled opposition is. Many of the issues can be shown to be such actions, intentioned to make it look like they are "against the Cabal," when in fact they are the opposite. So many of the actions that appear to be against, can be shown, through who is doing it, and where they are getting their funding, to be a fiction to placate the opposition, and create a false enemy.