You make some good points and I can see why what I said sounded contradictory.

"So let me see if I have this right. Carfentanyl is a deadly drug and the government absolutely has the right not just to tell people not to inject it, but to kill anyone who distributes it."

The context is here is that the cartels are an arm of the deep-state and explicitly part of the enemy in this war. They have been intimately involved in so many aspects of this whole sordid affair. After some sense returns to the planet no scheduled drugs should be regulated whatsoever.

"....not only questioning whether it might cause long term damages is irrelevant, the state has not right to tell you what you can take or not, the substance is irrelevant." - Yes.

"So the question that begs itself into being asked, is who gets to decide what is a deadly drug and whats not to be questioned? " After this, no one. They are all legal to posses and manufacture.

"As for the private defence agencies and communal militias - do you not see a problem there ?" - Yes, yes I do. It is a curly one and I do not have a decent answer to your concern.

What you have suggested in your three points is a sensible starting point.

Bosi wanted to roll laws back to 1913 or so as a starting point and then ask the Australian people how they wanted to be governed going forward.

Edit:- I still don't like Bosi for his puritanical views and advocacy of continued government theft.

I am not advocating tearing everything up right out of the gate rather than continued movement away from anything that looks like the over-government that we have had.

You make some good points and I can see why what I said sounded contradictory.

"So let me see if I have this right. Carfentanyl is a deadly drug and the government absolutely has the right not just to tell people not to inject it, but to kill anyone who distributes it."

The context is here is that the cartels are an arm of the deep-state and explicitly part of the enemy in this war. They have been intimately involved in so many aspects of this whole sordid affair. After some sense returns to the planet no scheduled drugs should be regulated whatsoever.

"....not only questioning whether it might cause long term damages is irrelevant, the state has not right to tell you what you can take or not, the substance is irrelevant." - Yes.

"So the question that begs itself into being asked, is who gets to decide what is a deadly drug and whats not to be questioned? " After this, no one. They are all legal to posses and manufacture.

"As for the private defence agencies and communal militias - do you not see a problem there ?" - Yes, yes I do. It is a curly one and I do not have a decent answer to your concern.

What you have suggested in your three points is a sensible starting point.

Bosi wanted to roll laws back to 1913 or so as a starting point and then ask the Australian people how they wanted to be governed going forward.

Edit:- I still don't like Bosi for his puritanical views.

I am not advocating tearing everything up right out of the gate rather than continued movement away from anything that looks like the over-government that we have had.

You make some good points and I can see why what I said sounded contradictory.

"So let me see if I have this right. Carfentanyl is a deadly drug and the government absolutely has the right not just to tell people not to inject it, but to kill anyone who distributes it."

The context is here is that the cartels are an arm of the deep-state and explicitly part of the enemy in this war. They have been intimately involved in so many aspects of this whole sordid affair. After some sense returns to the planet no scheduled drugs should be regulated whatsoever.

"....not only questioning whether it might cause long term damages is irrelevant, the state has not right to tell you what you can take or not, the substance is irrelevant." - Yes.

"So the question that begs itself into being asked, is who gets to decide what is a deadly drug and whats not to be questioned? " After this, no one. They are all legal to posses and manufacture.

"As for the private defence agencies and communal militias - do you not see a problem there ?" - Yes, yes I do. It is a curly one and I do not have a decent answer to your concern.

What you have suggested in your three points is a sensible starting point.

Bosi wanted to roll laws back to 1913 or so as a starting point and then ask the Australian people how they wanted to be governed going forward.

I am not advocating tearing everything up right out of the gate rather than continued movement away from anything that looks like the over-government that we have had.