My dog just obliterated a long reply--I think the choice of a small section of spike protein to be mimicked was lazy, thoughtless, and unconscionable because Pfizer soon knew it was toxic. Besides being toxic in itself, so not a good thing to program your body to produce, it was a poor idea because the virus has other binding sites. When the vaccine stimulated a reaction against this one site, the virus was not really stopped, it was stimulated to evolve variants. Why non-sterilizing vaccines are not a good idea. A real vaccine should attack some part of its target and cause it to stop reproducing, and/or self-destruct. Edit: that isn't quite right: a real vaccine stimulates the immune system to attack the whole pathogen, thus killing it. The covid vaccines could at best only stimulate an attack against a part of the pathogen. These lazy "vaccines" were designed to make the body make antibodies proactively, like the immune system wouldn't start doing that right away on exposure.

The other thing about the spike protein is that it binds to ACE2 receptors which are all through the body in the vascular system. If the virus is causing damage by hooking on to those receptors to get into the cells that have them, how can it possibly help anything to have more little ACE blockers running around saying to the lymphocytes "attack me!"? The end result of repeated injections of this irritant is that the lymphocytes that should be attacking the virus are now ignoring it. Yet it isn't a harmless irritant like plant pollen, it's something that is getting into cells to hijack the material to replicate itself. Why people who don't know enough about how the immune system works shouldn't be meddling in it. It seems like these vaccine designers never consulted qualified physiologists.

But that isn't the only problem. The nano lipid particles that carry the mRNA are also toxic, that's why they are supposed to stay at the injection site, only they often don't. The spike protein and the mRNA also have other "unexpected" interactions, none of which have been good. Just bad planning, bad manufacturing, bad testing, all around, compounded with knowledge suppression.

My dog just obliterated a long reply--I think the choice of a small section of spike protein to be mimicked was lazy, thoughtless, and unconscionable because Pfizer soon knew it was toxic. Besides being toxic in itself, so not a good thing to program your body to produce, it was a poor idea because the virus has other binding sites. When the vaccine stimulated a reaction against this one site, the virus was not really stopped, it was stimulated to evolve variants. Why non-sterilizing vaccines are not a good idea. A real vaccine should attack some part of its target and cause it to stop reproducing, and/or self-destruct. These lazy "vaccines" were designed to make the body make antibodies proactively, like the immune system wouldn't start doing that right away on exposure.

The other thing about the spike protein is that it binds to ACE2 receptors which are all through the body in the vascular system. If the virus is causing damage by hooking on to those receptors to get into the cells that have them, how can it possibly help anything to have more little ACE blockers running around saying to the lymphocytes "attack me!"? The end result of repeated injections of this irritant is that the lymphocytes that should be attacking the virus are now ignoring it. Yet it isn't a harmless irritant like plant pollen, it's something that is getting into cells to hijack the material to replicate itself. Why people who don't know enough about how the immune system works shouldn't be meddling in it. It seems like these vaccine designers never consulted qualified physiologists.

But that isn't the only problem. The nano lipid particles that carry the mRNA are also toxic, that's why they are supposed to stay at the injection site, only they often don't. The spike protein and the mRNA also have other "unexpected" interactions, none of which have been good. Just bad planning, bad manufacturing, bad testing, all around, compounded with knowledge suppression.