I responded to the post to u/eagle-eyes2020 put up and I think its worth putting over here for you folks, too. It could be a...
Showstopper
Very cool, fren 😎
CAA - Central Artists Agency
You mean Creative Artists Agency right?? I just wanted to make sure we had the correct name.
So this gave me a very interesting thought or two for some reason. Not even necessarily related to the docu itself but just from what I've been looking at/researching over the past few days.
Earlier we were clowning Clott Adam's. Someone posted a clip of him talking about how Tucker's opening monologue this past Thursday affected him strongly. THAT was about how Nixon won the largest margin of victory in the country when he was re-elected, only to be "removed" through Watergate.
4/5 people who snuck into the building were CIA. Bob Woodward was a Naval officer turned reporter who happened to get the story. Nixon was replaced by Ford, a member of the Warren Comission. The 🤡 got rid of Spiro Agnew, Nixon's VP, through a tax investigation.
*The Watergate Tapes featured a part where Nixon, speaking to the CIA Deputy Director, told him "I know what happened to John..." He was met with silence. Then shortly after removal. Replaced by Gerald Ford, unelected for either VP or President, who served on the Warren commission, who did what exactly? That's right they exonerated the CIA of involvement with JFK assassination. Ford allowed the Church commission to do its work, in part because faith in those institutions was at an all time low and public trust needed to be reinstated. From the film: 46:00
Whew, that line was a doozy: "Church didn't get anything WE didn't give him."
Cross referencing the film again: 46:50 - 51:00 or around there
So Adams was talking and going down the list of Presidents who could've had involvement with Intel. Reagan? No... but! He was shot. Assassination attempt... and a lot of weirdness by George Bush Sr. immediately going to Texas following that refusing to go back to D.C. and so forth.
How about all the Presidents since GW? Not so clear if ANY of them before Trump were NOT ALL INTEL ASSETS. In fact it's rather likely. One family member of Bush, Clinton and Obama BOTH come from nowhere popular with people types, DEEP FAMILY CONNECTIONS with the Agency.
So does it stand to reason that maybe Bush just was the completion of the TAKEOVER started after JFK got taken out? And he was THE REAL POTUS until he died and Trump was the retaliatory method, timed perfectly to be elected upon the old man's death? Look again at your Q post: This was a hostile takeover from an evil corrupt network of players (not just Democrats).
At that time thought to be reference to HRC/Obama but he makes sure to mention NOT JUST DEMS & NO REFERENCE as to WHEN the hostile takeover occured. Might've been many years ago.
Then: POTUS is 100% insulated - any discussion suggesting he’s even a target is false.
Trump COULD NOT have worked against [DS] unless this was 100% true. Past assassinations prove that out.
So this whole mission was completed and OUT of their hands from the moment Trump took office. The rest now is child's play - allowing them to strike back, try desperately to wrest back control from the White Hats, in the process completely voiding their trust and faith from the public, exposing themselves [what is necessary and ABLE to be shown at least] and finally destroying themselves.
I like to imagine a toddler in a playpen, exasperated, angrily throwing toys and knocking stuff over, shaking the barricade occasionally and running about, causing mayhem inside that managed little area, until finally they collapse on the ground in tears.
The past 60 years they kept us in darkness, well now its your turn.
Go to sleep.
I responded to the post to u/eagle-eyes2020 put up and I think its worth putting over here for you folks, too. It could be a...
Showstopper
Very cool, fren 😎
CAA - Central Artists Agency
You mean Creative Artists Agency right?? I just wanted to make sure we had the correct name.
So this gave me a very interesting thought or two for some reason. Not even necessarily related to the docu itself but just from what I've been looking at/researching over the past few days.
Earlier we were clowning Clott Adam's. Someone posted a clip of him talking about how Tucker's opening monologue this past Thursday affected him strongly. THAT was about how Nixon won the largest margin of victory in the country when he was re-elected, only to be "removed" through Watergate.
4/5 people who snuck into the building were CIA. Bob Woodward was a Naval officer turned reporter who happened to get the story. Nixon was replaced by Ford, a member of the Warren Comission. The 🤡 got rid of Spiro Agnew, Nixon's VP, through a tax investigation.
*The Watergate Tapes featured a part where Nixon, speaking to the CIA Deputy Director, told him "I know what happened to John..." He was met with silence. Then shortly after removal. Replaced by Gerald Ford, unelected for either VP or President, who served on the Warren commission, who did what exactly? That's right they exonerated the CIA of involvement with JFK assassination. Ford allowed the Church commission to do its work, in part because faith in those institutions was at an all time low and public trust needed to be reinstated. From the film: 46:00
So Adams was talking and going down the list of Presidents who could've had involvement with Intel. Reagan? No... but! He was shot. Assassination attempt... and a lot of weirdness by George Bush Sr. immediately going to Texas following that refusing to go back to D.C. and so forth.
How about all the Presidents since GW? Not so clear if ANY of them before Trump were NOT ALL INTEL ASSETS. In fact it's rather likely. One family member of Bush, Clinton and Obama BOTH come from nowhere popular with people types, DEEP FAMILY CONNECTIONS with the Agency.
So does it stand to reason that maybe Bush just was the completion of the TAKEOVER started after JFK got taken out? And he was THE REAL POTUS until he died and Trump was the retaliatory method, timed perfectly to be elected upon the old man's death? Look again at your Q post: This was a hostile takeover from an evil corrupt network of players (not just Democrats).
At that time thought to be reference to HRC/Obama but he makes sure to mention NOT JUST DEMS & NO REFERENCE as to WHEN the hostile takeover occured. Might've been many years ago.
Then: POTUS is 100% insulated - any discussion suggesting he’s even a target is false.
Trump COULD NOT have worked against [DS] unless this was 100% true. Past assassinations prove that out.
So this whole mission was completed and OUT of their hands from the moment Trump took office. The rest now is child's play - allowing them to strike back, try desperately to wrest back control from the White Hats, in the process completely voiding their trust and faith from the public, exposing themselves [what is necessary and ABLE to be shown at least] and finally destroying themselves.
I like to imagine a toddler in a playpen, exasperated, angrily throwing toys and knocking stuff over, shaking the barricade occasionally and running about, causing mayhem inside that managed little area, until finally they collapse on the ground in tears.
The past 60 years they kept us in darkness, well now its your turn.