No I'm not that way. I'm one of the smart ones.
But I only follow 'a plan' up to a point.
What lost some of my support for this "great hostage negociation" (because that's what this is, when you take the 40,000 ft. view) is when the cabal was ALLOWED to "start executing" the hostages!!
SO, you are essentially saying that YES, those millions of lost lives are "a necessary part" of the great awakening.
THINK ABOUT IT. That's what you're saying.
And my retort is, trillions of possibilities, how could there --NOT-- have been a better way??
What ever happened to "you and your families are SAFE"?
Or, was this politically oriented?
Let's recap:
In scenario 'A': early arrests!! civil war!! millions of deaths!!
In scenario 'B': great awakening!! civil war avoided!! millions of deaths!!
I only merely stopped falling for that "false dichotomy".
Because I think there MUST be a better way BESIDES those two options!
Don't YOU think so?
At this point in time, Trump could easily change his stance on jabs and still save the day!
So why doesn't he, AT THIS POINT?
No I'm not that way. I'm one of the smart ones.
But I only follow 'a plan' up to a point.
What lost some of my support for this "great hostage negociation" (because that's what this is, when you take the 40,000 ft. view) is when the cabal was ALLOWED to "start executing" the hostages!!
SO, you are essentially saying that YES, those millions of lost lives are "a necessary part" of the great awakening.
THINK ABOUT IT. That's what you're saying.
And my retort is, trillions of possibilities, how could there --NOT-- have been a better way??
In scenario 'A': early disclosure!! civil war!! millions of deaths!!
In scenario 'B': great awakening!! civil war avoided!! millions of deaths!!
I only merely stopped falling for that "false dichotomy": Because I think there MUST be a better way BESIDES those two options! Don't YOU think so?
At this point in time, Trump could easily change his stance on jabs and still save the day!
So why doesn't he, AT THIS POINT?