Full mechanism is not known, but it likely was "a good deal" that could not be refused by some of the landowners. The true data on number of Southern landowners that actually used slaves is likely much lower than promoted by the cabal-media.

Remember that the South had a thriving economy of sharecroppers who were getting paid in gold/silver issued by the states for their labor. And this arrangement added significantly to the productivity and wealth of the South. My theory is that because the individual landowners in the South refused to Corporatize the assets like in the North, they get targeted with lots of misinformation about how widespread slavery really was.

One could argue that slavery was more trouble than it was worth, and it clearly was against the strong Christian Bible values held by most large and wealthy Southern landowners. They were wealthy because they owned the land, not because they owned the slaves, imo.

Full mechanism is not known, but it likely was "a good deal" that could not be refused by some of the landowners. The true data on number of Southern landowners that actually used slaves is likely much lower than promoted by the cabal-media.

Remember that the South had a thriving economy of sharecroppers who were getting paid in gold/silver issued by the states for their labor. And this arrangement added significantly to the productivity and wealth of the South. My theory is that because the individual landowners in the South refused to Corporatize the assets like in the North, they get targeted with lots of misinformation about how widespread slavery really was.

Once could argue that slavery was more trouble than it was worth, and it clearly was against the strong Christian Bible values held by most large and wealthy Southern landowners. They were wealthy because they owned the land, not because they owned the slaves, imo.