AMPS is not a government body, this is an independent professional society without political affiliation.
From reading all the resources, it appears AMPS contacted the Department of Health and Aged Care (an actual government department) for clarification regarding off hand comments the previous government made regarding a blanket indemnity scheme for COVID injections.
It looks like such a scheme was never actually implemented, and the indemnity referred to is provided by conventional liability insurance for the medical profession - the protection of which depends on informed consent.
The department of health and aged care have also said in their correspondence that "evidence-based" information is provided for doctors and patients to comply with informed consent. This appears to be their way of avoiding liability - using their propaganda data as justification, regardless of whether it was true or false.
That's my interpretation. I can't tell if this is a nothing burger or not. At the very least, it does seem like the gov is saying medical professionals are on their own.
AMPS is not a government body, this is an independent professional society without political affiliation.
From reading all the resources, it appears AMPS contacted the Department of Health and Aged Care (an actual government department) for clarification regarding off hand comments the previous government made regarding a blanket indemnity scheme for COVID injections.
It looks like such a scheme was never actually implemented, and the indemnity referred to is provided by conventional liability insurance for the medical profession - the protection of which depends on informed consent.
The department of health and aged care have also said in their correspondence that "evidence-based" information is provided for doctors and patients to comply with informed consent. This appears to be their way of avoiding liability - using their propaganda data as justification, regardless of whether it was true or false.
That's my interpretation. I can't tell if this is a nothing burger or not.
AMPS is not a government body, this is an independent professional society without political affiliation.
From reading all the resources, it appears AMPS contacted the Department of Health and Aged Care (an actual government department) for clarification regarding off hand comments the previous government made regarding a blanket indemnity scheme for COVID injections.
It looks like such a scheme was never actually implemented, and the indemnity referred to is provided by conventional liability insurance for the medical profession - the protection of which depends on informed consent.
The department of health and aged care have also said in their correspondence that "evidence-based" information is provided for doctors and patients to comply with informed consent. This appears to be there way of avoiding liability - using their propaganda data as justification, regardless of whether it was true or false.
That's my interpretation. I can't tell if this is a nothing burger or not.
AMPS is not a government body, this is an independent professional society without political affiliation.
From reading all the resources, it appears AMPS contacted the Department of Health and Aged Care (an actual government department) for clarification regarding off hand comments the previous government made regarding a blanket indemnity scheme for COVID injections.
It looks like such a scheme was never actually implemented, and the indemnity referred to is provided by conventional liability insurance for the medical profession - the protection of which depends on informed consent.
That's my interpretation. I can't tell if this is a nothing burger or not.