Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It’s mostly all Pfizer and all mRNA, even though the Astra Zeneca, J&J, Novavax, Sinovax etc are all comparably lethal and injurious. I think we are going to see a Pfall guy to get us off the scent of genocide, democide, crimes against humanity etc.

Look out for these tells in all jab related commentary:

Do they mostly blame MRNA jabs and ignore adenoviral monkey DNA jabs despite comparable if not worse harms?

Do they mostly blame Pfizer over Moderna? They will rarely mention Astra Zeneca and J&J since they are adenovirals.

Do they still defend “traditional” vaccines as a safe and effective intervention generally?

Do they still promote “viruses and variants as pathogens” and germ theory orthodoxy in general?

Do they say adverse reactions are unfortunate but mostly rare and we should halt or pause to do some study just to be safe?

Do they say COVID vaccines are necessary for a specific cohort - immunocompromised, elderly, or indeed for those working with these groups such as care staff?

Do they say the died suddenly phenomenon, falling birth rates, unprecedented excess deaths and all cause mortality statistics being reported around the world are not evidence of causation being correlation, and we should do more studies?

Do they say depop, culling, genocide etc references are conspiracy theories and not helpful?

Do they say COVID-19 illness also causes the same outcomes purported to be jab-related?

Do they suggest or infer mainstream or spurious statistics or studies to pour shade over prominent truth narratives eg an obscure counter-study explaining excess deaths as missed medical screenings?

If they answer yes to any of the above, they are likely a shill or useful idiot or just professionally blinkered at best, or a dedicated and paid off gatekeeper/herder, disinformation agent or Judas Goat at worst. Maybe even in the direct employ of the See Aye Ey.

1 year ago
4 score
Reason: Original

It’s mostly all Pfizer and all mRNA, even though the Astra Zeneca, J&J, Novavax, Sinovax etc are all comparably lethal and injurious. I think we are going to see a Pfall guy to get us off the scent of genocide, democide, crimes against humanity etc.

Look out for these tells in all jab related commentary:

Do they mostly blame MRNA jabs and ignore adenoviral monkey DNA jabs despite comparable if not worse harms?

Do they mostly blame Pfizer over Moderna? They will rarely mention Astra Zeneca and J&J since they are adenovirals.

Do they still defend “traditional” vaccines as a safe and effective intervention generally?

Do they still promote “viruses and variants as pathogens” and germ theory orthodoxy in general?

Do they say adverse reactions are unfortunate but mostly rare and we should halt or pause to do some study just to be safe?

Do they say COVID vaccines are necessary for a specific cohort - immunocompromised, elderly, or indeed for those working with these groups such as care staff?

Do they say the died suddenly phenomenon, falling birth rates, unprecedented excess deaths and all cause mortality statistics being reported around the world are not evidence of causation being correlation, and we should do more studies?

Do they say depop, culling, genocide etc references are conspiracy theories and not helpful?

Do they say COVID-19 illness also causes the same outcomes purported to be jab-related?

Do they suggest or infer mainstream or spurious statistics or studies to pour shade over prominent truth narratives eg an obscure counter-study explaining excess deaths as missed medical screenings?

If they answer yes to any of the above, they are likely a shill or useful idiot or just professional blinkered at best, or a dedicated and paid off gatekeeper/herder, disinformation agent or Judas Goat at worst. Maybe even in the direct employ of the See Aye Ey.

1 year ago
1 score