Why does the answer need to be either/or? Why cant it be both were researching it and sharing data? We already know Ralph Baric at UNC was researching along these lines. There were probably labs all over the world testing against different genomes, using different but related pathogens, and sharing this research amongst themselves.
These biolabs worldwide were all complicit and receiving taxpayer money all towards the same ends. Bill Gates recent "new pandemic" comments confirm this. And we know that Ukraine was sharing info with biolabs in the former SSR of Georgia.
This is a tangled web. Purposely tangled. It provides cover for the op and plausible deniability for the principles.
Why does the answer need to be either/or? Why cant it be both were researching it and sharing secrets? We already know Ralph Baric at UNC was researching along these lines. There were probably labs all over the world testing against different genomes, using different but related pathogens, and sharing this research amongst themselves.
These biolabs worldwide were all complicit and receiving taxpayer money all towards the same ends. Bill Gates recent "new pandemic" comments confirm this. And we know that Ukraine was sharing info with biolabs in the former SSR of Georgia.
This is a tangled web. Purposely tangled. It provides cover for the op and plausible deniability for the principles.
Why does the answer need to be either/or? Why cant it be both were researching it and sharing secrets? We already know Ralph Baric at UNC was researching along these lines. There were probably labs all over the world testing against different genomes, using different but related pathogens, and sharing this research amongst themselves.
These biolabs worldwide were all complicit and receiving taxpayer money all towards the same ends. Bill Gates recent "new pandemic" comments confirm this. And we know that Ukraine was sharing info with biolabs in the former SSR of Georgia.
This is a tangled web. Purposely tangled. It provides cover and plausible deniability.