Nah. DJT cannot confirm Devolution until the operation reaches openness. But he's constantly giving nods to anons, and a "nod" to patel patriot, burning bright and devo theory.

Does one really need a hinted nod from DJT to be a "confirmation" of devo? The data points are already there. "No devo" just doesn't make sense.

Equating "nods" with confirmations misconstrues the purpose, imo. DJT is one, constantly confirming that Q and anons are legit, and two, is continually plugging stuff to open normie minds and get maga more aligned with Q by providing all these little nudges.

So, imo, this is NOT for you and I. It's NOT a confirmation. It's a nudge to move MAGA and others who aren't aware of Q and Devo, etc, towards those ideas gaining more territory in their minds.

Nah. DJT cannot confirm Devolution until the operation reaches openness. But he's constantly giving nods to anons, and a "nod" to patel patriot, burning bright and devo theory.

Does one really need a hinted nod from DJT to be a "confirmation" of devo? The data points are already there. "No devo" just doesn't make sense.

Equating "nods" with confirmations misconstrues the purpose, imo. DJT is one, constantly confirming that Q and anons are legit, abd two, is continually plugging stuff to open normie minds and get maga more aligned with Q by providing all these little nudges.

So, imo, this is NOT for you and I. It's NOT a confirmation. It's a nudge to move MAGA and others who aren't aware of Q and Devo, etc, towards those ideas gaining more territory in their minds.