Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Correct. Just pointing out that they intentionally manipulated the situation to avoid the obvious form of liability if they truly were doing it "for our protection". Not liable per contract law, but clearly liable under other types of law.


Also, if it was highly effective and truly worked, economics of demand would indicate astronomical prices to get it. Valuable product in low supply should not be free, even with go'vt subsidies. Black market should have developed, and not clear that it did.

1 year ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

Correct. Just pointing out that they intentionally manipulated the situation to avoid the obvious form of liability if they truly were doing it "for our protection". Not liable per contract law, but clearly liable under other types of law.


Also, if it was highly effective and truly worked,, economics of demand would indicate astronomical prices to get it. Valuable product in low supply should not be free, even with go'vt subsidies. Black market should have developed, and not clear that it did.

1 year ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Correct. Just pointing out that they intentionally manipulated the situation to avoid the obvious form of liability if they truly were doing it "for our protection".


Also, if it was highly effective and truly worked,, economics of demand would indicate astronomical prices to get it. Valuable product in low supply should not be free, even with go'vt subsidies. Black market should have developed, and not clear that it did.

1 year ago
1 score