Q was correct, and the comparison of Nazis to communists has been a credible view within political science for many years. The book Liberal Fascism is based on this argument. Fascism and communism are ideological cousins that are authoritarian, socialist, and expansionistic. The main difference is that communism relies on the state to control the means of production, while fascism relies on state corporatism to control it. We see this today in the Chinese Communist Party, which has technically turned China into a fascist state.

The father of fascism was Benito Mussolini, who was a self-declared socialist until the day he died. Hitler's problem with the communist party wasn't ideological, it's that they were rivals.

What Q was also hinting at in #940 was that the Antifaschistische was ultimately controlled by the same puppet masters as the Nazis, and that Antifa uses the same street thug tactics as the Nazi Brownshirts. Antifa is a George Soros creation, and Soros is a descendant of the Nazi Legacy.

So I'd say Q was 100% correct in #940.

Q was correct, and the comparison of Nazis to communists has been a credible view within political science for many years. The book Liberal Fascism is based on this argument. Fascism and communism are ideological cousins that are authoritarian, socialist, and expansionistic. The main difference is that communism relies on the state to control the means of production, while fascism relies on state corporatism to control it. We see this today in the Chinese Communist Party, which has technically turned China into a fascist state.

Those who disagree with this view simply base their arguments on the Nazis being nationalistic, which is irrelevant when they were just as expansionistic as the communists.

The father of fascism was Benito Mussolini, who was a self-declared socialist until the day he died. Hitler's problem with the communist party wasn't ideological, it's that they were rivals.

So I'd say Q was 100% correct in #940.