I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. Some groups of Gnostics don't use any teachings by Paul. Paul is a quagmire, but there is evidence that suggests Paul may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

You can't rule except by fear and hate. It doesn't work. People realize their own agency unless they are afraid and feel they need "help" from an external source. Thus through fear they are willing to give up liberty (self-agency) for security.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. Some groups of Gnostics don't use any teachings by Paul. Paul is a quagmire, but there is evidence that suggests Paul may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

You can't rule except by fear and hate. It doesn't work. People realize their own agency unless they are afraid and feel they need "help" from an external source. Thus they are willing to give up liberty (self-agency) for security.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. Some groups of Gnostics don't use any teachings by Paul. Paul is a quagmire, but there is evidence that suggests Paul may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

You can't rule except by fear and hate. It doesn't work. People realize their own agency unless they are afraid and feel they need "help" from an external ruler.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. Some groups of Gnostics don't use any teachings by Paul (though some do). There is evidence that suggests Paul may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus (though that is far from conclusive, there is a lot of conflicting evidence there).

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

You can't rule except by fear and hate. It doesn't work. People realize their own agency unless they are afraid and feel they need "help" from an external ruler.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. Some groups of Gnostics don't use any teachings by Paul (though some do). There is evidence that suggests Paul may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus (though that is far from conclusive, there is a lot of conflicting evidence there).

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. They don't use any teachings by Paul, who the evidence suggests may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, ensuring they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal. Thus they went from being the Opposition, to being Controlled Opposition through the creation and control of the formal Church and it's tenets.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically wrong is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. They don't use any teachings by Paul, who the evidence suggests may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, and ensure they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically lying is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. They don't use any teachings by Paul, who the evidence suggests may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, and ensure they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.) used for exactly this purpose.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically lying is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. They don't use any teachings by Paul, who the evidence suggests may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first. In the case of the Church they kinda did both. The Opposition were the people who listened to Jesus. The Church was the formal system designed to rule all of those people, and ensure they all believed the same thing, not thinking for themselves, but thinking aligned with a specific goal.

Control the narrative, control the belief, control society, control the world.

And that is exactly what happened.

Muslim was created for the same purpose by the same people for the same reason, and then set in opposition to Christianity specifically because you must have an enemy if you want to rule through fear and hate.

All enemies have been a contrivance by the same group (Nazi's, USSR, etc.).

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically lying is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. They don't use any teachings by Paul, who the evidence suggests may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

They couldn't stop the teachings of Jesus from being far reaching, but they could control what those beliefs were. That is the nature of Controlled Opposition. Start the agency of opposition if you know its coming, hijack it if someone else starts it first.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically lying is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. They don't use any teachings by Paul, who the evidence suggests may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that gets labeled as "crazy.".

I have never heard of Adam Green. I have never looked at his work. I came to this conclusion based on evidence that I have found during my investigation. Assuming that someone you don't like who says something you don't like is automatically lying is a major flaw in any investigation. It isn't the source of the evidence you must question, but the evidence itself. You MUST dig into the evidence to even begin to approach the truth. You must go to the primary sources, or you haven't investigated anything.

ALL of the cases you are making of a "Jew v. Catholic" narrative are exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like. That is evidence for, not evidence against.

Just like in Governments, Wars, or propaganda of any sort, the way it works is, if there is something they don't want you to see, they say nothing about it at all. The Jews have controlled all press, all works of literature, since the time of Christ. If the Catholic Church (and Islam, and the Reformation religions) were not their contrivance, no one (or very few) would have ever heard them. They would have all gone the way of Gnosticism, or Zoroasterism, etc.

THOSE are the things they are really trying to keep you away from. Not that I am suggesting any of those things are true either, but Gnosticism especially uses all of the Gospels to tell it's story, not just the Gospels of the Bible. They don't use any teachings by Paul, who the evidence suggests may have been a Jewish double agent, designing specifically to lead Christians along the wrong path, a path away from the real teachings of Jesus.

You MUST read the originals, and understand the errors commonly employed in translations from the original, before you can understand the fuckery.

Watch this before you bother writing me back.

I will watch it. I didn't watch it first because my response is to address your misunderstanding of what Controlled Opposition is. When you really dig in, you realize it is everywhere. The world has been run by Controlled Opposition for thousands of years. The only way to always win is to be both sides. The true "other side," is the side you never hear about, or the side that get labeled as "crazy.".