Look at the evidence itself. Evidence is all that matters. The source of the evidence is irrelevant (unless the source IS the evidence).

Looking up the first two claims the evidence is very compelling.

Here is Richard Scobee on linkedin. Look at the pictures on the "satire site". He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older Astronaut Richard Scobee.

Here is Michael J. Smith of University of Wisconson, a professor of engineering. He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older aeronautical engineer/astronaut named Michael J. Smith.

I stopped there because I was just testing your "satire" theory (AKA an ad hominem against the presenter of the evidence, not a direct address of the evidence itself). Your theory is not supported by the evidence.

Look at the evidence itself. Evidence is all that matters. The source of the evidence is irrelevant (unless the source IS the evidence).

Looking up the first two claims the evidence is very compelling.

Here is Richard Scobee on linkedin. Look at the pictures on the "satire site". He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older Astronaut Richard Scobee.

Here is Michael J. Smith of University of Wisconson, a professor of engineering. He looks an awful lot like a 35 year older aeronautical engineer/astronaut named Michael J. Smith.

I stopped there because I was just testing your "satire" theory. It is not supported by the evidence.