The article states:
"The FDA serves to protect Americans, including critically ill patients and their families, from the potential harms of untested drugs."
While I read this article, I kept thinking of Ivermectin and HCQ. How utterly naive is this quoted statement above. The FDA really serves BIG Pharma interests.... not protecting Americans. If anything the FDA serves to protect Big Pharma from Americans.
The real standard has always been prevention. Why all the emphasis on 'last rights' or as the article states, "patients who have exhausted other options," 100% of health is based on prevention. How much investment ever goes in prophylactic medicine? Not much.... no money in it. I'm reminded that it's all based on profits and the reason why doctors are now turning away patients. And taking away licenses of doctors that prescribe Ivermectin and HCL. Then I am again reminded of Dr. Burzynski's persecution from the FDA. The years of suffering from these FDA attacks only epitomize it's long string of abusive powers and unmasks the FDA.
The article states:
"The FDA serves to protect Americans, including critically ill patients and their families, from the potential harms of untested drugs."
While I read this article, I kept thinking of Ivermectin and HCQ. How utterly naive is this quoted statement above. The FDA really serves BIG Pharma interests.... not protecting Americans. If anything the FDA serves to protect Big Pharma from Americans.
The real standard has always been prevention. Why all the emphasis on 'last rights' or as the article states, "patients who have exhausted other options," 100% of health is based on prevention. How much investment ever goes in prophylactic medicine? Not much.... no money in it. I'm reminded that it's all based on profits and the reason why doctors are now turning away patients. And taking away licenses of doctors that prescribe Ivermectin and HCL. Then I am again reminded of Dr. Burzynski's persecution from the FDA. The years of suffering from these FDA attacks only epitomize unmasking of the FDA.
The article states:
"The FDA serves to protect Americans, including critically ill patients and their families, from the potential harms of untested drugs."
While I read this article, I kept thinking of Ivermectin and HCQ. How utterly naive is this quoted statement above. The FDA really serves BIG Pharma interests.... not protecting Americans. If anything the FDA serves to protect Big Pharma from Americans.
The real standard has always been prevention. Why all the emphasis on 'last rights' or as the article states, "patients who have exhausted other options," 100% of health is based on prevention. How much investment ever goes in prophylactic medicine? Not much.... no money in it. I'm reminded that it's all based on profits and the reason why doctors are now turning away patients. And taking away licenses of doctors that prescribe Ivermectin and HCL. Then I am again reminded of Dr. Burzynski's persecution from the FDA.