I haven't watched this yet but I will tomorrow. WF is pretty great. He does his homework and is an excellent presenter without "taking sides," which gives his red pills a broader audience than most.

I think he gets a lot of things wrong in the sense that, like most people, there are always proclamations or hints that "the conspiracy can't be THAT big" (when the evidence suggests it is) and his research reflects that attitude, but he does a lot better than most.

I haven't watched this yet but I will tomorrow. WF is pretty great. He does his homework and is an excellent presenter without "taking sides," which gives his red pills a broader audience than most.

I think he gets a lot of things wrong in the sense that, like most people, there are always proclamations or hints that "the conspiracy can't be THAT big" (when the evidence suggests it is), but he does a lot better than most.

I haven't watched this yet, but I will tomorrow. WF is pretty great. He does his homework and is an excellent presenter without "taking sides," which gives his red pills a broader audience than most.

I think he gets a lot of things wrong in the sense that, like most people, there are always proclamations or hints that "the conspiracy can't be THAT big" (when the evidence suggests it is), but he does a lot better than most.

I haven't watched this yet, but I will tomorrow. WF is pretty great. He does his homework and is an excellent presenter without "taking sides," which gives his red pills a broader audience than most.

I think he gets a lot of things wrong in the sense that, like most people, there are always proclamations or hints that the "conspiracy can't be THAT big" (when the evidence suggests it is), but he does a lot better than most.