Everything is a psyop. We can't always be sure of who's controlling each of the players. We need abundant information to draw good conclusions. I have not had strong trust in Stew Peters personally, but I could be wrong. It may be better to take note of his comment and move on. There is so much more information of value to focus on. There may be a strong case that can be made against him to protect others from being misled. Since I do not follow him closely, I can't make that case, but will keep any evidence of controlled opposition (and I have seen some) in the back of my mind. Edit: 2EyesOpen brings good information to the conversation above.

Everything is a psyop. We can't always be sure of who's controlling each of the players. We need abundant information to draw good conclusions. I have not had strong trust in Stew Peters personally, but I could be wrong. It may be better to take note of his comment and move on. There is so much more information of value to focus on. There may be a strong case that can be made against him to protect others from being misled. Since I do not follow him closely, I can't make that case, but will keep any evidence of controlled opposition (and I have seen some) in the back of my mind.