You explain to me why gnomes are impossible and improbable as causes of earthquakes. I certainly can't. Nor can anyone. It is the same with mystery earthquake machines, operating on unknown principles.

You have no conception of logical analysis. It is never an obligation to show that things cannot happen. It is an obligation to show that things can happen. You don't have a shred of evidence to suggest that any such agency as "earthquake machines" is at work. And I maintain, fanciful suspicion (delusional paranoia) is not evidence or cause to believe. When "rumors" are nothing more than urban myth, you have lost your ability to tell fact from fancy. I haven't and I don't feel any need to apologize for having a clear view.

It seems that everybody on this page is willing to go along with and nurture the other guy's wild fantasy in order to be on the receiving end of similar sympathy. It leads to fringe conspiracy nuttiness, where magic and pseudo-science are accepted as replacements for actual science. It is clear that not too many people playing at being an "anon" have much of a scientific education, yet they feel at ease declaring that this or that fabulous technology is merely "hidden" and lurking behind some sinister curtain. I've actually worked on classified technology, and I find this attitude completely childish.

Where I am right now is with my feet firmly planted on the ground. In earthquake and volcanic eruption country.

You explain to me why gnomes are impossible and improbable as causes of earthquakes. I certainly can't. Nor can anyone. It is the same with mystery earthquake machines, operating on unknown principles.

You have no conception of logical analysis. It is never an obligation to show that things cannot happen. It is an obligation to show that things can happen. You don't have a shred of evidence to suggest that any such agency as "earthquake machines" is at work. And I maintain, fanciful suspicion (delusional paranoia) is not evidence or cause to believe. When "rumors" are nothing more than urban myth, you have lost your ability to tell fact from fancy. I haven't and I don't feel any need to apologize for having a clear view.

It seems that everybody on this page is willing to go along with and nurture the other guy's wild fantasy in order to be on the receiving end of similar sympathy. It leads to fringe conspiracy nuttiness, where magic and pseudo-science is accepted as replacements for actual science. It is clear that not too many people playing at being an "anon" have much of a scientific education, yet they feel at ease declaring that this or that fabulous technology is merely "hidden" and lurking behind some sinister curtain. I've actually worked on classified technology, and I find this attitude completely childish.

Where I am right now is with my feet firmly planted on the ground. In earthquake and volcanic eruption country.