Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue, in part, are integral to these documents, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest (sour grapes). (3) However, it is the authenticity of the documents that must be examined and completely separated from the divorce/custody issue.

In stating this, I believe some people are using this jumping-the-gun with the divorce/custody issue for discrediting J. Thuler. The cart is before the mule as a result. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy to this thinking: it would be justified to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who already knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.

Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue, in part, are integral to these documents, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest (sour grapes). (3) However, it is the authenticity of the documents that must be examined and completely separated from the divorce/custody issue.

In stating this, I believe some people are using this jumping-the-gun with the divorce/custody issue for discrediting J. Thuler. The cart is before the mule as a result. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy to this thinking: it would be justified to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.

Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue, in part, are integral to these documents, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest (sour grapes). (3) However, it is the authenticity of the documents that must be examined and completely separated from the divorce/custody issue.

In stating this, I believe some people are using this jumping-the-gun with the divorce/custody issue for discrediting J. Thuler. The cart is before the mule as a result. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy, to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.

Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue, in part, are integral to these documents, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest (sour grapes). (3) However, it is the authenticity of the documents that must be examined and completely separated from the divorce/custody issue.

In stating this, I believe some people are using this jumping-the-gun with the divorce/custody issue to discredit J. Thuler. The cart is before the mule as a result. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy, to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.

Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue, in part, are integral to these documents, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest (sour grapes). (3) However, it is the authenticity of the documents that must be examined and completely separated from the divorce/custody issue.

In stating this, I believe some people are using the jumping the gun with the divorce/custody issue to discredit J. Thuler. The cart is before the mule as a result. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy, to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.

Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue, in pat, are integral to these documents, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest (sour grapes). (3) However, it is the authenticity of the documents that must be examined and completely separated from the divorce/custody issue.

In stating this, I believe some people are using the jumping the gun with the divorce/custody issue to discredit J. Thuler. The cart is before the mule as a result. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy, to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.

Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue, in pat, are integral to these documents, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest (sour grapes). (3) However, it is the authenticity of the documents that must be examined and completely separated from the divorce/custody issue.

In stating this, I'm only saying people are discrediting J. Thuler because these documents originated in a child custody issue. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't necessarily germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy, to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.

Look, I am not saying J. Thuler is right or wrong here. I believe (1) he should provide all his documents to a vetted and qualified team of experts. (2) Because J. Thuler's ex-wife and a child custody issue are integral in part to these documents, it appears to be a conflict of interest (sour grapes).

In stating this, I'm only saying people are discrediting J. Thuler because these documents originated in a child custody issue. Regardless of his divorce history, this fact isn't necessarily germane for discrediting the overall research. The documents may indeed show illegal activities. As an analogy, to claim Johnny Carson wasn't a good talk show host because he was divorced three times.

Your polemic above is an observation from a distant vantage point. This applies to anyone not possessing the J. Thuler documents and completely verifying them. Notwithstanding, it seems you may not understand the financial gravity in custody issues and how this may relate to your missive. Custody and visitation disputes are among the most stressful situations facing families and the courts. This statement I just made is an understatement. There is little 'justice' in family courts. It's 'just us' in a star chamber with a magistrate or judge, who knows to continue the money stream or face the consequence of career stunting or canceling. The divorce industry is a trillion dollar extortion racket. There are so many facets to this, that to be unfortunate enough to experience it, it is as if falling into an alternate world. It's shock-and-awe to divorcing fathers experiencing it. One facet of this is revealed by asking the facetious question: What do you get when you mix equal parts of gender myth, a casual disregard of Constitutional protections, and old fashioned political pork? VAWA – the Violence Against Women Act -- that’s what. VAWA permits women to have offices in the very court building where these custody tribunals are held. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter, who are often male hating militant lesbians, promote the filing of such domestic abuse complaints. Yes, I am not making this up. They are given charge of filling out ex-parte orders that are essentially restraining orders against the father. These centers, supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved guardian-ward; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife.

The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she “fears for her safety.” An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. A “fear” crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male. It is estimated that sixty-six percent of all domestic abuse charges are false.1 Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too. Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

Long lost acquaintances, and even friends having college degrees and very good jobs and careers, have described to me returning to their homes after work, to be surprised by a police officer waiting for them. Without knowing an ex parte restraining order was issued. For violating the order, they were arrested and thrown in jail and released in the next day.

Why am I mentioning this? It appears that J. Thuler has had similar experiences. We know that at least one court hearing that apparently took place without him being notified. By the way, this is also a common tactic used to take the children away from the parent. A subsequent warrant was issued for J. Thuler's arrest. I'm interpreting this as part of a much bigger journey J. Thuler experienced, and in doing so, stirred up a hornet's nest. I knew someone who previously did pretty much the same thing. He was well-known to the surrounding courts. He'd win cases pro se, but these were Pyrrhic victories. The police would wait for him and recharge him of the same violation that he won in court. Another night in jail and back in court, shackled hand and feet, in front of a judge pleading his case all over again. The war he waged against the system was much bigger than him and it killed him. He was a friend of mine, who had charisma and was stubborn beyond belief. He too was fighting to have access to his son. Now he's dead.

It appears there have been attempts on J. Thuler's life. If you think J. Thuler's research and documents are tainted because the justice system has attempted to criminalize and thereby discrediting him, this is all common tactics in lawfare.