People have slightly different reactions to the same disease
Of course they do. The reason is, perception is subjective. As such, a conflict event that might cause you to fear death, may have no effect on me, or vice versa. Additionally, the duration and intensity of the conflict event determines duration and intensity of the dis-ease. If I fear I'm going to die for a day, I get undetectable lung cancer for a day, followed by undetectable tuberculosis for a day. If I'm afraid I'm going to die for a year, I'm going to get easily detectable lung cancer for a year should I be foolish enough to get an "annual checkup". I'm actually perfectly healthy during this time, receiving more oxygen than normal to all my organs, which is the purpose of the excess lung alveoli tissue. Now, should I resolve my conflict and no longer fear death, I'm going to have a year of coughing up blood and blood in my sputum - aka "tuberculosis". Should I be foolish enough to run to an allopathic doctor in the western world, I'm going to be told I have quite possibly "incurable" lung cancer. If I'm in a poorer country, I will be told I have tuberculosis and given round after round of anti-biotics (against-lifes) which prevent the TB mycobacteria from removing the excess lung tissue, thus leaving an encapsulated cyst of the no longer needed lung alveoli. Should I then have the misfortune of moving to a first world country later on, and am foolish enough to get an "annual checkup" with a western allopahtic doctor, I'll now be told I have a "benign tumor" and will be heavily coerced into getting it surgically removed - an entirely unnecessary procedure that will only cause me more long-term harm.
Dis-eases are not caused by "germs" or "substances". Everything we've been told about them is 100% wrong. And this is easy to understand once you realize the germ theory model is a total lie, just as is the fraudulent "genetic dis-ease model" is a lie, just as is the "lifestyle/habits model" is a lie, just as is the "family history model", just as is the "carcinogen model" and on and on we go. None are even remotely accurate or true. Western medicine is 90% lies, the only saving grace is emergency/trauma care.
Your alcohol example is not an example of dis-ease, it is an example of a poisoning. It's immediate and the direct cause is evident. I drink too much for my size and tolerance level, my body has to go into overdrive to purge the poison. Simple.
While stress, including stress induced by trauma, can inhibit the immune system, adhering to false beliefs or believing incorrect information does not have such an effect. At best this would be the Placebo effect.
Stress is the wearing down of the body - lack of ease, pease, sleep, etc. can and often does lead to a period of vitality drain. Again, duration and intensity determine the degree of sickness. But, like your alcohol example, it's not the cause of a well-defined "dis-ease", but rather forces a period of heavy rest to rebalance. Stress/Anxiety is not the cause of any dis-eases like cancers, heart dis-ease, diabetes, fake auto-immune diseases, and on and on. Each of these has a well-defined and specific conflict event that precedes them. Now, could a certain conflict event ALSO cause one stress/anxiety. Of course. If I'm afraid I'm going to die, I get lung cancer as from the example above. That can cause me a lot of stress and anxiety, obviously, but in and of itself, is not the cause of lung cancer.
Here's a good example of what I'm saying. Imagine a presumably happily married couple, They have their normal issues and spats, but nothing out of the ordinary. One day the husband approaches the wife after dinner and tells her he wants a divorce. Just like that. The wife didn't see it coming. This is a "Conflict shock event". She's caught off guard and her own subjective perception of the event leads to her eventual dis-ease down the road. If she felt she becomes scared of what will happen to her, she gets bronchitis, whooping cough, throat/larynx issues. If she then has an existential/abandonment crisis on top of the the scare conflict, in time she gets pneumonia - water retention in the lungs. If she feels she can't earn a living to care for her children, she gets a starvation conflict which causes liver cancer. If she fears her husband will take the kids, she has a separation conflict and gets ductal breast cancer. If she becomes angry, she gets hepatitis. If she becomes extremely angry, she gets stomach cancer. If it turns out her husband was actually having a homosexual affair and perceives this as a "dirty conflict" and gets bladder or colon cancer. If she decides to retaliate and get revenge through a brutal fight over the property and money she gets pancreatic cancer. And on and on. There's a very specific biological reason for each that is initiated by her subjective perception of the situation. Her psyche makes certain tissue alterations to help her through the conflict. When she resolves her conflict, the psyche reverses the changes and this is normally we we "get sick". And to wit, another woman might be secretly relieved and feel liberated in this event. She doesn't get sick at all. This is a demonstration of the subjective nature of 'conflict events".
The Placebo/Nocebo effect is very real. The irony of this situation is, 90% of what we call "dis-eases" are already in the healing/restoring/rebalancing phase when we run to the doctor. And this is why you will hear of a thousand different remedies for all manner of dis-eases from people out there. The medication/herb/tincture/formula/treatment/healing-modality/etc. that they sought out had nothing whatsoever to do with their healing. It was already underway. And likewise, when the white-robed priest tells the patient they have cancer or some other life-threatening dis-ease, this creates a "diagnosis shock" and the patient spirals downward into all sorts of terminal illnesses, just from hearing the bad news from "the expert doctor". The iatrogenesis category of death statistics should be 100x what is attributed to it today.
No, Covid was a DS attempt to start their Great Reset by instituting lockdowns, Covid passes, and election fraud.
Well we agree on this. Imagine all the conflict shocks that resulted from this propaganda campaign. But the DS was well aware of the new infusions of light and how best to time their propaganda. I know several people, including 2 family members and 7 friends who swear up and down they "caught Covid" earlier in 2019 before it was even a "thing". The peak intensity of these light waves was 2020 so this is when the DS decided to put their propaganda into full throttle.
Just because you deny the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
I don't DENY EVIDENCE.... EVER. I ACCEPT EVIDENCE always. You've got things backwards. If you BELIEVE in viruses, you have unwittingly ACCEPTED FRAUDULENT NON-EVIDENCE to come to your conclusions.
The truth is, nobody has ever produced even a modicum of evidence of the existence of viruses. From 1875 and the onslaught of the insane Louis Pastuer, until the mid 1930s, nobody could even SEE/FIND a so-called virus due to technological limitations as the electron microscope was not yet in use. But that didn't stop them from blaming all sorts of dis-eases on these theoretical boogeymen. Rabies, smallpox, polio, Spanish flu, etc. From about 1935 to 1954 scientific researchers frantically tried to find our boogeymen, but to no avail. Virology was dead in the water until Jon Enders came along and designed the fraudulent "viral culturing" technique which is nothing more than the poisoning of green monkey kidney cells. They take pictures of the decayed particles of this witches brew and say "here look, a virus"...and everybody blindly believes them to such a degree, they never even tried to purify these tissue particles and attempt to infect a healthy host with them - the ruse was that good. Talk about BLIND BELIEF IN AUTHORITY on steroids! The more modern "sequencing" techniques for allegedly finding viruses is really even dumber. They just assemble human RNA/DNA strands into their boogeyman in a software program and the brainwashed minions once again blindly believe. Funny how their tissue samples never contain a single FULLY INTACT VIRAL GENOME. All these brilliant researchers can ever find are tiny strands of what they fraudulent claim were once part of viruses. It's all a massive lie.
Viruses have been proven to exist,
Wrong you are. The above two MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES is what they call their "proof". You can BELIEVE them at your own peril if you choose. But the fact remains, nobody has ever found a virus in nature, in the real world, in the fluids or tissues of any living organism. Should you dare to investigate, you'll get a big chuckle out of their excuses - "there's not enough there" or "they're hidden within the cell membrane". Laughable excuses from the virologists. They want you to believe this while at the same time inducing fear into your mind that a person standing 5.99 feet or less away from you can conjure up a microscopic piece of spittle inadvertently sent in your direction that's teaming with millions of unicorn-viral particles. These two positions cannot be reconciled. It's pure insanity to believe such absurdities.
Then you need to come up with a model for virus-based diseases that explains the symptoms and spread of such diseases more accurately and in a more concise manner than viruses.
I did do this here on GA about 4 months ago for about a dozen different popular alleged "viral-diseases" - colds, flus, measles/rubella, mumps, chicken pox, spanish flu, polio, rabies, HIV, pneumonia and tuberculosis (bacterial). Those should be more than enough to satisfy your standards. Which one would you like an answer for? I'll point you to it.
Thanks for engaging with your counter-arguments. This is how we all learn. I've been intensely studying this topic for over 3 years now, since the onset of Covid. I too was once a virus-believer until I decided to stop blindly trusting the experts and find out for myself.
People have slightly different reactions to the same disease
Of course they do. The reason is, perception is subjective. As such, a conflict event that might cause you to fear death, may have no effect on me, or vice versa. Additionally, the duration and intensity of the conflict event determines duration and intensity of the dis-ease. If I fear I'm going to die for a day, I get undetectable lung cancer for a day, followed by undetectable tuberculosis for a day. If I'm afraid I'm going to die for a year, I'm going to get easily detectable lung cancer for a year should I be foolish enough to get an "annual checkup". I'm actually perfectly healthy during this time, receiving more oxygen than normal to all my organs, which is the purpose of the excess lung alveoli tissue. Now, should I resolve my conflict and no longer fear death, I'm going to have a year of coughing up blood and blood in my sputum - aka "tuberculosis". Should I be foolish enough to run to an allopathic doctor in the western world, I'm going to be told I have quite possibly "incurable" lung cancer. If I'm in a poorer country, I will be told I have tuberculosis and given round after round of anti-biotics (against-lifes) which prevent the TB mycobacteria from removing the excess lung tissue, thus leaving an encapsulated cyst of the no longer needed lung alveoli. Should I then have the misfortune of moving to a first world country later on, and am foolish enough to get an "annual checkup" with a western allopahtic doctor, I'll now be told I have a "benign tumor" and will be heavily coerced into getting it surgically removed - an entirely unnecessary procedure that will only cause me more long-term harm.
Dis-eases are not caused by "germs" or "substances". Everything we've been told about them is 100% wrong. And this is easy to understand once you realize the germ theory model is a total lie, just as is the fraudulent "genetic dis-ease model" is a lie, just as is the "lifestyle/habits model" is a lie, just as is the "family history model", just as is the "carcinogen model" and on and on we go. None are even remotely accurate or true. Western medicine is 90% lies, the only saving grace is emergency/trauma care.
Your alcohol example is not an example of dis-ease, it is an example of a poisoning. It's immediate and the direct cause is evident. I drink too much for my size and tolerance level, my body has to go into overdrive to purge the poison. Simple.
While stress, including stress induced by trauma, can inhibit the immune system, adhering to false beliefs or believing incorrect information does not have such an effect. At best this would be the Placebo effect.
Stress is the wearing down of the body - lack of ease, pease, sleep, etc. can and often does lead to a period of vitality drain. Again, duration and intensity determine the degree of sickness. But, like your alcohol example, it's not the cause of a well-defined "dis-ease", but rather forces a period of heavy rest to rebalance. Stress/Anxiety is not the cause of any dis-eases like cancers, heart dis-ease, diabetes, fake auto-immune diseases, and on and on. Each of these has a well-defined and specific conflict event that precedes them. Now, could a certain conflict event ALSO cause one stress/anxiety. Of course. If I'm afraid I'm going to die, I get lung cancer as from the example above. That can cause me a lot of stress and anxiety, obviously, but in and of itself, is not the cause of lung cancer.
Here's a good example of what I'm saying. Imagine a presumably happily married couple, They have their normal issues and spats, but nothing out of the ordinary. One day the husband approaches the wife after dinner and tells her he wants a divorce. Just like that. The wife didn't see it coming. This is a "Conflict shock event". She's caught off guard and her own subjective perception of the event leads to her eventual dis-ease down the road. If she felt she becomes scared of what will happen to her, she gets bronchitis, whooping cough, throat/larynx issues. If she then has an existential/abandonment crisis on top of the the scare conflict, in time she gets pneumonia - water retention in the lungs. If she feels she can't earn a living to care for her children, she gets a starvation conflict which causes lung cancer. If she fears her husband will take the kids, she has a separation conflict and gets ductal breast cancer. If she becomes angry, she gets hepatitis. If she becomes extremely angry, she gets stomach cancer. If it turns out her husband was actually having a homosexual affair and perceives this as a "dirty conflict" and gets bladder or colon cancer. And on and on. There's a very specific biological reason for each that is initiated by her subjective perception of the situation. Her psyche makes certain tissue alterations to help her through the conflict. When she resolves her conflict, the psyche reverses the changes and this is normally we we "get sick". And to wit, another woman might be secretly relieved and feel liberated in this event. She doesn't get sick at all. This is a demonstration of the subjective nature of 'conflict events".
The Placebo/Nocebo effect is very real. The irony of this situation is, 90% of what we call "dis-eases" are already in the healing/restoring/rebalancing phase when we run to the doctor. And this is why you will hear of a thousand different remedies for all manner of dis-eases from people out there. The medication/herb/tincture/formula/treatment/healing-modality/etc. that they sought out had nothing whatsoever to do with their healing. It was already underway. And likewise, when the white-robed priest tells the patient they have cancer or some other life-threatening dis-ease, this creates a "diagnosis shock" and the patient spirals downward into all sorts of terminal illnesses, just from hearing the bad news from "the expert doctor". The iatrogenesis category of death statistics should be 100x what is attributed to it today.
No, Covid was a DS attempt to start their Great Reset by instituting lockdowns, Covid passes, and election fraud.
Well we agree on this. Imagine all the conflict shocks that resulted from this propaganda campaign. But the DS was well aware of the new infusions of light and how best to time their propaganda. I know several people, including 2 family members and 7 friends who swear up and down they "caught Covid" earlier in 2019 before it was even a "thing". The peak intensity of these light waves was 2020 so this is when the DS decided to put their propaganda into full throttle.
Just because you deny the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
I don't DENY EVIDENCE.... EVER. I ACCEPT EVIDENCE always. You've got things backwards. If you BELIEVE in viruses, you have unwittingly ACCEPTED FRAUDULENT NON-EVIDENCE to come to your conclusions.
The truth is, nobody has ever produced even a modicum of evidence of the existence of viruses. From 1875 and the onslaught of the insane Louis Pastuer, until the mid 1930s, nobody could even SEE/FIND a so-called virus due to technological limitations as the electron microscope was not yet in use. But that didn't stop them from blaming all sorts of dis-eases on these theoretical boogeymen. Rabies, smallpox, polio, Spanish flu, etc. From about 1935 to 1954 scientific researchers frantically tried to find our boogeymen, but to no avail. Virology was dead in the water until Jon Enders came along and designed the fraudulent "viral culturing" technique which is nothing more than the poisoning of green monkey kidney cells. They take pictures of the decayed particles of this witches brew and say "here look, a virus"...and everybody blindly believes them to such a degree, they never even tried to purify these tissue particles and attempt to infect a healthy host with them - the ruse was that good. Talk about BLIND BELIEF IN AUTHORITY on steroids! The more modern "sequencing" techniques for allegedly finding viruses is really even dumber. They just assemble human RNA/DNA strands into their boogeyman in a software program and the brainwashed minions once again blindly believe. Funny how their tissue samples never contain a single FULLY INTACT VIRAL GENOME. All these brilliant researchers can ever find are tiny strands of what they fraudulent claim were once part of viruses. It's all a massive lie.
Viruses have been proven to exist,
Wrong you are. The above two MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES is what they call their "proof". You can BELIEVE them at your own peril if you choose. But the fact remains, nobody has ever found a virus in nature, in the real world, in the fluids or tissues of any living organism. Should you dare to investigate, you'll get a big chuckle out of their excuses - "there's not enough there" or "they're hidden within the cell membrane". Laughable excuses from the virologists. They want you to believe this while at the same time inducing fear into your mind that a person standing 5.99 feet or less away from you can conjure up a microscopic piece of spittle inadvertently sent in your direction that's teaming with millions of unicorn-viral particles. These two positions cannot be reconciled. It's pure insanity to believe such absurdities.
Then you need to come up with a model for virus-based diseases that explains the symptoms and spread of such diseases more accurately and in a more concise manner than viruses.
I did do this here on GA about 4 months ago for about a dozen different popular alleged "viral-diseases" - colds, flus, measles/rubella, mumps, chicken pox, spanish flu, polio, rabies, HIV, pneumonia and tuberculosis (bacterial). Those should be more than enough to satisfy your standards. Which one would you like an answer for? I'll point you to it.
Thanks for engaging with your counter-arguments. This is how we all learn. I've been intensely studying this topic for over 3 years now, since the onset of Covid. I too was once a virus-believer until I decided to stop blindly trusting the experts and find out for myself.