Yes, his post does a lot of conflating.

“critics of the movement can turn around and point to specific instances”

Ok, so why couldn’t OP point to specific instances? He just has vague accusations that we’re supposed to conflate with facts.

“Know the difference between evil individuals, like Harvey Weinstein and Merrick Garland, and Judaism. Yes, the individuals are evil, but that does not justify saying that all Jewish people are evil.”

OP needs to quote serious people on GAW who have said, “all Jewish people are evil.” Otherwise, this is libel/ slander, and a weak straw man argument.

Also, note his conflation. In just those two sentences, he goes from people, to ideology, and then back to people. I’ll do the separation for him: not all jewish people are evil, but judaism is evil. It’s ideological texts are manuals for entitled psychopathy, claiming it’s acceptable to murder and rob people who aren’t in the entitlement club.

Yes he is.

“critics of the movement can turn around and point to specific instances”

Ok, so why couldn’t OP point to specific instances? He just has vague accusations that we’re supposed to conflate with facts.

“Know the difference between evil individuals, like Harvey Weinstein and Merrick Garland, and Judaism. Yes, the individuals are evil, but that does not justify saying that all Jewish people are evil.”

OP needs to quote serious people on GAW who have said, “all Jewish people are evil.” Otherwise, this is libel/ slander, and a weak straw man argument.

Also, note his conflation. In just those two sentences, he goes from people, to ideology, and then back to people. I’ll do the separation for him: not all jewish people are evil, but judaism is evil. It’s ideological texts are manuals for entitled psychopathy, claiming it’s acceptable to murder and rob people who aren’t in the entitlement club.