Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
1. Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
2. Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Looks And Smells Fishy?
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instinct tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Same Risk With Deutsche Bank
I heard similar stories about Deutsche Bank. Many of their largest clients are presently moving their cash out. For those not familiar with Deutsche Bank, it is the 8th largest bank in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
The largest bank in Europe is HSBC Holdings PLC, UK. Which was allegedly created to primarily do illegal money laundering for people with Evil behaviors. My instinct tells me that for people with Good behaviors, HSBC is by far the most risky bank to do business with and store cash at.
Source about the ranking at:
Lots of sources about HSBC's alleged money laundering:
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
1. Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
2. Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Looks And Smells Fishy?
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instinct tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Same Risk With Deutsche Bank
I heard similar stories about Deutsche Bank. Many of their largest clients are presently moving their cash out. For those not familiar with Deutsche Bank, it is the 8th largest bank in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
The largest bank in Europe is HSBC Holdings PLC, UK. Which was allegedly created to primarily do illegal money laundering for people with Evil behaviors. My instinct tells me that for people with Good behaviors, HSBC is by far the most risky bank to do business with and store cash at.
Source about the ranking at:
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
1. Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
2. Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Looks And Smells Fishy?
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instinct tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Same With Deutsche Bank
I heard similar stories about Deutsche Bank. Many of their largest clients are presently moving their cash out. For those not familiar with Deutsche Bank, it is the 8th largest bank in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
The largest bank in Europe is HSBC Holdings PLC, UK. Which was allegedly created to primarily do illegal money laundering for people with Evil behaviors. My instinct tells me that for people with Good behaviors, HSBC is by far the most risky bank to do business with and store cash at.
Source about the ranking at:
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
1. Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
2. Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Looks And Smells Fishy?
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instinct tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
1. Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
2. Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Looks And Smells Fishy?
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instead tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instead tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by their known local/domestic members. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Cash at their local credit union. The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Cash at their local credit union. The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
This week, stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Cash at their local credit union. The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". As they have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
This week, stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Cash at their local credit union. The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union".
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
This week, stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Cash at their local credit union. The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
- Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their credit union.
- Moved Cash AROUND WF
This week, stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Cash at their local credit union. The keyword here is "Decentralized".