I have a sincere question regarding the Brunson case. Didn't SCOTUS already reject this on 2 occasions? And perhaps a more important question regarding the validity of the Brunson case is reported by TGP:

Conservative Treehouse opines that by eliminating the motions from the records of the House, they could certify the fraud with no detractors on record and give SCOTUS a reason to claim that cases before it lacked standing.

In order to prevent those two motions, the Speaker of the House, the Minority Leaders, and the President of the Congress (VP Pence) could not be PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.

This allowed Speaker Pelosi to suspend the Congress UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. The crisis invoked emergency procedures and Pelosi was able to prevent the delay of certification herself.

When Congress returned later that night, Pelosi was in charge:

The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!…

…it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities.

But how did Pence know this ahead of time so that he could clarify it in his statement that he released while President Trump was still talking?

This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.

IT pretty much explains why people were ushered up to the capital and then invited into the capital building. In stating this, SCOTUS might have only the option to consider this legalistically. An emergency was indeed invoked, but fraudulently. Doesn't the fraud have to be exposed first in order to to declare the emergency rules null and void?

Another question is -- Did the minority leader, Kevin McCarthy know? Evidently, he left the chamber too.

I have a sincere question regarding the Brunson case. Didn't SCOTUS already reject this on 2 occasions? And perhaps a more important question regarding the validity of the Brunson case is reported by TGP:

Conservative Treehouse opines that by eliminating the motions from the records of the House, they could certify the fraud with no detractors on record and give SCOTUS a reason to claim that cases before it lacked standing.

In order to prevent those two motions, the Speaker of the House, the Minority Leaders, and the President of the Congress (VP Pence) could not be PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.

This allowed Speaker Pelosi to suspend the Congress UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. The crisis invoked emergency procedures and Pelosi was able to prevent the delay of certification herself.

When Congress returned later that night, Pelosi was in charge:

The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!…

…it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities.

But how did Pence know this ahead of time so that he could clarify it in his statement that he released while President Trump was still talking?

This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.

In stating this, SCOTUS might have onlt the option to consider this legalistically. An emergency was indeed invoked, but fraudulently. Doesn't the fraud have to be exposed first in order to to declare the emergency rules null and void?

Another question is -- Did the minority leader, Kevin McCarthy know? Evidently, he left the chamber too.