My investigation suggests that everything other than Religion is Controlled Opposition. People are placed into boxes; their thoughts and beliefs are guided through Propaganda, Rhetoric, Experts, and False Flags. Every event that I have looked in to has shown direct control on all sides by the same Agency.

This Evil that J.P. Sears says he has seen that led him to The Good has been controlled by Someone. Nothing is organic. The questions are, Who was the evil controlled by, and why. The "how" is important too, but my report (linked above) is all about the how.

"Who" is a group I call The Trust. The Trust is sometimes called The Cabal, or Satanists, or the Illuminati, etc. I call them The Trust because they currently rule by Trust Law; laws specific to a type of corporation (legal entity) called a "trust." I suggest their name is irrelevant and tends to place investigation itself into a box.

My investigation suggests The Trust is everywhere, and they control everything. My investigation suggests that all entities in "opposition" are either created by or, if they arise organically and reach sufficient popularity, are subjugated by The Trust. In other words, there are, on this planet, as far as I have been able to find, zero organizations with reasonable popularity that were not created by or subjugated by this single entity. That may have changed recently, but I am not convinced of that. For now, I will assume nothing. Through the control of these organizations, the beliefs of everyone across the planet are controlled by The Trust. I call this conglomeration of beliefs The Matrix. The organizations (echo chambers) that promote all the various beliefs, have at the top, and scattered throughout, agents of The Trust. It is these people who’s work gains prominence because they get the financial backing and the promotion in publication and the news required to “make it big.”

Most people here are aware this happens in the corporate world, the government, and any “Leftish Political Group” (BLM, Antifa, etc.). What some appreciate, but not all, is that all the “right” groups are also controlled by the same entity. The Right's beliefs have been guided just as much as those on the left. Both sides receive parts of the Truth, but not the whole truth. They are set against each other through talking points handed out by the talking heads. This allows “The Left” and “The Right” to focus on their disagreements, not looking at their commonalities; not attempting to discuss, but rather, fight over “irreconcilable differences.” They are only irreconcilable because they are designed to be. Each side takes a stance for which there can be no compromise, thus there will only be a strict line of division. I call this method of control "The Prison of Two Ideas."

WRT the OP, J.P. gives reasons for his “change of heart” on what is “truth”. He cites evidence that supports some of the tenets of his new/old Religion. Because things he thought were bullshit before turned out to have evidence for, he assumes that all of the tenets that he formerly believed were false are actually true. This is a self-induced fallacy of composition argument. “Part of it is true, when I thought it wasn’t, therefore the rest must be true as well.” The evidence suggests that this fallacy is used intentionally through rhetoric (and thus taught to us and commonly employed in our reasoning) in all other areas of controlling the beliefs of people, a form of Controlled Opposition.

He also says that the “other side” (in this case Communism) are trying to keep us away from these tenets, and Communism is bad, therefore “what they are trying to hide” must be the truth. That also is a self-induced fallacy, in this case an ad hominem (against the person argument), and a fundamental control system for controlled opposition in all other areas. I suggest ad hominems are the most prevelant form of rhetoric that guides belief. They are so common in fact, they literally rule the world. Or rather, the world is ruled by the creation of “other,” and by stating “other’s beliefs” are false because they are other. Through this method of dismissal, we allow ourselves to not actually listen to what “other” is really saying. Instead we pull out the talking points we were handed and use them as rebuttal. Those “rebuttals” are designed to cause a reaction strictly in opposition, thus keeping everyone divided. Controlled Opposition.

When a person transitions their beliefs, in all other areas (a Left to Right shift, e.g.), they transition from one box to another by these self-induced logical fallacies.

If these methods are employed in all other areas, is it possible that all of our beliefs are subject to the same controlling entity?

My investigation has put it beyond a reasonable doubt (for me) that this same method of control includes the Formal Religious Organizations themselves. They are a part of The Trust. Worse, it’s not just the ones that exist today; rather, this goes back forever. I’m not talking about the inspirations of the various Religions (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), I’m talking about the formal Religions, the canned box of beliefs, the tenets, and the control structure that surrounds those tenets. When you really dig into their origins, and the origins of the tenets themselves, and more importantly, what's been left out, an entirely new picture emerges of the nature of our reality.

In the case of Religion, which J.P. is espousing, whether the beliefs of that Religion are true or not, the Religion itself puts the mind into a box. Thus any investigation from within that box fails if any important evidence is outside of it. So IF it isn’t true, or is missing really important pieces of information, a person will not see it, nor will they be able to see it, because they believe their box contains all the truth there is on the subject.

I suggest the only way to get to the truth is to keep your mind open to seeing all of the evidence. If you are in a box, if you are “Religious” over “Spiritual” you have placed yourself in a box of someone’s design. Every other cult than yours believes their box is special; divinely inspired. "There is no need to look at anything else; it’s all self-contained." What makes yours right, when all the others are wrong? Might they all be boxes, designed to control?

I’m not trying to tell anyone “the Truth.” I don’t know what the Truth is. But I suggest if you aren’t willing to look at certain pieces of evidence in earnest, you should ask yourself "why?" Is it because your beliefs make you feel safe? It is by exploitation of our concept of “safety” that all fuckery occurs in all other areas ("Those who would give up Liberty for Security will get neither" (paraphrased)). Is it POSSIBLE, that that has happened in the beliefs systems that ruled most of the world for the previous two millennia as well?

I suggest that if you can’t ask that question in earnest, you are still stuck in The Matrix.

My investigation suggests that everything other than Religion is Controlled Opposition. People are placed into boxes; their thoughts and beliefs are guided through Propaganda, Rhetoric, Experts, and False Flags. Every event that I have looked in to has shown direct control on all sides by the same Agency.

This Evil that J.P. Sears says he has seen that led him to The Good has been controlled by Someone. Nothing is organic. The questions are, Who was the evil controlled by, and why. The "how" is important too, but my report (linked above) is all about the how.

"Who" is a group I call The Trust. The Trust is sometimes called The Cabal, or Satanists, or the Illuminati, etc. I call them The Trust because they currently rule by Trust Law; laws specific to a type of corporation (legal entity) called a "trust." I suggest their name is irrelevant and tends to place investigation itself into a box.

My investigation suggests The Trust is everywhere, and they control everything. My investigation suggests that all entities in "opposition" are either created by or, if they arise organically and reach sufficient popularity, are subjugated by The Trust. In other words, there are, on this planet, as far as I have been able to find, zero organizations with reasonable popularity that were not created by or subjugated by this single entity. That may have changed recently, but I am not convinced of that. For now, I will assume nothing. Through the control of these organizations, the beliefs of everyone across the planet are controlled by The Trust. I call this conglomeration of beliefs The Matrix. The organizations (echo chambers) that promote all the various beliefs have at the top, and scattered throughout, agents of The Trust. It is these people who’s work gains prominence because they get the financial backing and the promotion in publication and the news required to “make it big.”

Most people here are aware this happens in the corporate world, the government, and any “Leftish Political Group” (BLM, Antifa, etc.). What some appreciate, but not all, is that all the “right” groups are also controlled by the same entity. The Right's beliefs have been guided just as much as those on the left. Both sides receive parts of the Truth, but not the whole truth. They are set against each other through talking points handed out by the talking heads. This allows “The Left” and “The Right” to focus on their disagreements, not looking at their commonalities; not attempting to discuss, but rather, fight over “irreconcilable differences.” They are only irreconcilable because they are designed to be. Each side takes a stance for which there can be no compromise, thus there will only be a strict line of division. I call this method of control "The Prison of Two Ideas."

WRT the OP, J.P. gives reasons for his “change of heart” on what is “truth”. He cites evidence that supports some of the tenets of his new/old Religion. Because things he thought were bullshit before turned out to have evidence for, he assumes that all of the tenets that he formerly believed were false are actually true. This is a self-induced fallacy of composition argument. “Part of it is true, when I thought it wasn’t, therefore the rest must be true as well.” The evidence suggests that this fallacy is used intentionally through rhetoric (and thus taught to us and commonly employed in our reasoning) in all other areas of controlling the beliefs of people, a form of Controlled Opposition.

He also says that the “other side” (in this case Communism) are trying to keep us away from these tenets, and Communism is bad, therefore “what they are trying to hide” must be the truth. That also is a self-induced fallacy, in this case an ad hominem (against the person argument), and a fundamental control system for controlled opposition in all other areas. I suggest ad hominems are the most prevelant form of rhetoric that guides belief. They are so common in fact, they literally rule the world. Or rather, the world is ruled by the creation of “other,” and by stating “other’s beliefs” are false because they are other. Through this method of dismissal, we allow ourselves to not actually listen to what “other” is really saying. Instead we pull out the talking points we were handed and use them as rebuttal. Those “rebuttals” are designed to cause a reaction strictly in opposition, thus keeping everyone divided. Controlled Opposition.

When a person transitions their beliefs, in all other areas (a Left to Right shift, e.g.), they transition from one box to another by these self-induced logical fallacies.

If these methods are employed in all other areas, is it possible that all of our beliefs are subject to the same controlling entity?

My investigation has put it beyond a reasonable doubt (for me) that this same method of control includes the Formal Religious Organizations themselves. They are a part of The Trust. Worse, it’s not just the ones that exist today; rather, this goes back forever. I’m not talking about the inspirations of the various Religions (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), I’m talking about the formal Religions, the canned box of beliefs, the tenets, and the control structure that surrounds those tenets. When you really dig into their origins, and the origins of the tenets themselves, and more importantly, what's been left out, an entirely new picture emerges of the nature of our reality.

In the case of Religion, which J.P. is espousing, whether the beliefs of that Religion are true or not, the Religion itself puts the mind into a box. Thus any investigation from within that box fails if any important evidence is outside of it. So IF it isn’t true, or is missing really important pieces of information, a person will not see it, nor will they be able to see it, because they believe their box contains all the truth there is on the subject.

I suggest the only way to get to the truth is to keep your mind open to seeing all of the evidence. If you are in a box, if you are “Religious” over “Spiritual” you have placed yourself in a box of someone’s design. Every other cult than yours believes their box is special; divinely inspired. "There is no need to look at anything else; it’s all self-contained." What makes yours right, when all the others are wrong? Might they all be boxes, designed to control?

I’m not trying to tell anyone “the Truth.” I don’t know what the Truth is. But I suggest if you aren’t willing to look at certain pieces of evidence in earnest, you should ask yourself "why?" Is it because your beliefs make you feel safe? It is by exploitation of our concept of “safety” that all fuckery occurs in all other areas ("Those who would give up Liberty for Security will get neither" (paraphrased)). Is it POSSIBLE, that that has happened in the beliefs systems that ruled most of the world for the previous two millennia as well?

I suggest that if you can’t ask that question in earnest, you are still stuck in The Matrix.

My investigation suggests that everything other than Religion is Controlled Opposition. People are placed into boxes; their thoughts and beliefs are guided through Propaganda, Rhetoric, Experts, and False Flags. Every event that I have looked in to has shown direct control on all sides by the same Agency.

This Evil that J.P. Sears says he has seen that led him to The Good has been controlled by Someone. Nothing is organic. The questions are, Who was the evil controlled by, and why. The "how" is important too, but my report (linked above) is all about the how.

"Who" is a group I call The Trust. The Trust is sometimes called The Cabal, or Satanists, or the Illuminati, etc. I call them The Trust because they currently rule by Trust Law; laws specific to a type of corporation (legal entity) called a "trust." I suggest their name is irrelevant and tends to place investigation itself into a box.

My investigation suggests The Trust is everywhere, and they control everything. My investigation suggests that all entities in "opposition" are either created by or, if they arise organically and reach sufficient popularity, are subjugated by The Trust. In other words, there are, on this planet, as far as I have been able to find, zero organizations with reasonable popularity that were not created by or subjugated by this single entity. That may have changed recently, but I am not convinced of that. For now, I will assume nothing. Through the control of these organizations, the beliefs of everyone across the planet are controlled by The Trust. I call this conglomeration of beliefs The Matrix. The organizations (echo chambers) that promote all the various beliefs have at the top, and scattered throughout, agents of The Trust. It is these people who’s work gains prominence because they get the financial backing and the promotion in publication and the news required to “make it big.”

Most people here are aware this happens in the corporate world, the government, and any “Leftish Political Group” (BLM, Antifa, etc.). What some appreciate, but not all, is that all the “right” groups are also controlled by the same entity. The Right's beliefs have been guided just as much as those on the left. Both sides receive parts of the Truth, but not the whole truth. They are set against each other through talking points handed out by the talking heads. This allows “The Left” and “The Right” to focus on their disagreements, not looking at their commonalities; not attempting to discuss, but rather, fight over “irreconcilable differences.” They are only irreconcilable because they are designed to be. Each side takes a stance for which there can be no compromise, thus there will only be a strict line of division. I call this method of control "The Prison of Two Ideas."

WRT the OP, J.P. gives reasons for his “change of heart” on what is “truth”. He cites evidence that supports some of the tenets of his new/old Religion. Because things he thought were bullshit before turned out to have evidence for, he assumes that all of the tenets that he formerly believed were false are actually true. This is a self-induced fallacy of composition argument. “Part of it is true, when I thought it wasn’t, therefore the rest must be true as well.” The evidence suggests that this fallacy is used intentionally through rhetoric (and thus taught to us and commonly employed in our reasoning) in all other areas of controlling the beliefs of people, a form of Controlled Opposition.

He also says that the “other side” (in this case Communism) are trying to keep us away from these tenets, and Communism is bad, therefore “what they are trying to hide” must be the truth. That also is a self-induced fallacy, in this case an ad hominem (against the person argument), and a fundamental control system for controlled opposition in all other areas. I suggest ad hominems are the most prevelant form of rhetoric that guides belief. They are so common in fact, they literally rule the world. Or rather, the world is ruled by the creation of “other,” and by stating “other’s beliefs” are false because they are other. Through this method of dismissal, we allow ourselves to not actually listen to what “other” is really saying. Instead we pull out the talking points we were handed and use them as rebuttal. Those “rebuttals” are designed to cause a reaction strictly in opposition, thus keeping everyone divided. Controlled Opposition.

When a person transitions their beliefs, in all other areas (a Left to Right shift, e.g.), they transition from one box to another by these self-induced logical fallacies.

If these methods are employed in all other areas, is it possible that all of our beliefs are subject to the same controlling entity?

My investigation has put it beyond a reasonable doubt (for me) that this same method of control includes the Formal Religious Organizations themselves. They are a part of The Trust. Worse, it’s not just the ones that exist today; rather, this goes back forever. I’m not talking about the inspirations of the various Religions (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), I’m talking about the formal Religions, the canned box of beliefs, the tenets, and the control structure that surrounds those tenets. When you really dig into their origins, and the origins of the tenets themselves, and more importantly, what's been left out, an entirely new picture emerges of the nature of our reality.

In the case of Religion, which J.P. is espousing, whether the beliefs of that Religion are true or not, the Religion itself puts the mind into a box. Thus any investigation from within that box fails if any important evidence is outside of it. So IF it isn’t true, or is missing really important pieces of information, a person will not see it, nor will they be able to see it, because they believe their box contains all the truth there is on the subject.

I suggest the only way to get to the truth is to keep your mind open to seeing all of the evidence. If you are in a box, if you are “Religious” over “Spiritual” you have placed yourself in a box of someone’s design. Every other cult than yours believes their box is special; divinely inspired. "There is no need to look at anything else; it’s all self-contained." What makes yours right, when all the others are wrong? Might they all be boxes, designed to control?

I’m not trying to tell anyone “the Truth.” I don’t know what the Truth is. But I suggest if you aren’t willing to look at certain pieces of evidence in earnest, you should ask yourself "why?" Is it because your beliefs make you feel safe? It is by exploitation of our concept of “safety” that all fuckery occurs in all other areas ("Those who would give up Liberty for Security will get neither" (paraphrased)). Is it POSSIBLE, that that has happened in the beliefs systems that ruled most of the world for the previous two millennia as well?

I suggest that if you can’t ask that question in earnest, you are still stuck in The Matrix.

My investigation suggests that everything other than Religion is Controlled Opposition. People are placed into boxes; their thoughts and beliefs are guided through Propaganda, Rhetoric, Experts, and False Flags. Every event that I have looked in to has shown direct control on all sides by the same Agency.

This Evil that J.P. Sears says he has seen that led him to The Good has been controlled by Someone. Nothing is organic. The questions are, Who was the evil controlled by, and why. The "how" is important too, but my report (linked above) is all about the how.

"Who" is a group I call The Trust. The Trust is sometimes called The Cabal, or Satanists, or the Illuminati, etc. I call them The Trust because they currently rule by Trust Law; laws specific to a type of corporation (legal entity) called a "trust." I suggest their name is irrelevant and tends to place investigation itself into a box.

My investigation suggests The Trust is everywhere, and they control everything. My investigation suggests that all entities in "opposition" are either created by or, if they arise organically and reach sufficient popularity, are subjugated by The Trust. In other words, there are, on this planet, as far as I have been able to find, zero organizations with reasonable popularity that were not created by or subjugated by this single entity. That may have changed recently, but I am not convinced of that. For now, I will assume nothing. Through the control of these organizations, the beliefs of everyone across the planet are controlled by The Trust. I call this conglomeration of beliefs The Matrix. The organizations (echo chambers) that promote all the various beliefs have at the top, and scattered throughout, agents of The Trust. It is these people who’s work gains prominence because they get the financial backing and the promotion in publication and the news required to “make it big.”

Most people here are aware this happens in the corporate world, the government, and any “Leftish Political Group” (BLM, Antifa, etc.). What some appreciate, but not all, is that all the “right” groups are also controlled by the same entity. The Right's beliefs have been guided just as much as those on the left. Both sides receive parts of the Truth, but not the whole truth. They are set against each other through talking points handed out by the talking heads. This allows “The Left” and “The Right” to focus on their disagreements, not looking at their commonalities; not attempting to discuss, but rather, fight over “irreconcilable differences.” They are only irreconcilable because they are designed to be. Each side takes a stance for which there can be no compromise, thus there will only be a strict line of division. I call this method of control "The Prison of Two Ideas."

WRT the OP, J.P. gives reasons for his “change of heart” on what is “truth”. He cites evidence that supports some of the tenets of his new/old Religion. Because things he thought were bullshit before turned out to have evidence for, he assumes that all of the tenets that he formerly believed were false are actually true. This is a self-induced fallacy of composition argument. “Part of it is true, when I thought it wasn’t, therefore the rest must be true as well.” The evidence suggests that this fallacy is used intentionally through rhetoric (and thus taught to us and commonly employed in our reasoning) in all other areas of controlling the beliefs of people, a form of Controlled Opposition.

He also says that the “other side” (in this case Communism) are trying to keep us away from these tenets, and Communism is bad, therefore “what they are trying to hide” must be the truth. That also is a self-induced fallacy, in this case an ad hominem (against the person argument), and a fundamental control system for controlled opposition in all other areas. I suggest ad hominems are the most prevelant form of rhetoric that guides belief. They are so common in fact, they literally rule the world. Or rather, the world is ruled by the creation of “other,” and by stating “other’s beliefs” are false because they are other. Through this method of dismissal, we allow ourselves to not actually listen to what “other” is really saying. Instead we pull out the talking points we were handed and use them as rebuttal. Those “rebuttals” are designed to cause a reaction strictly in opposition, thus keeping everyone divided. Controlled Opposition.

When a person transitions their beliefs, in all other areas (a Left to Right shift, e.g.), they transition from one box to another by these self-induced logical fallacies.

If these methods are employed in all other areas, is it possible that all of our beliefs are subject to the same controlling entity?

My investigation has put it beyond a reasonable doubt (for me) that this same method of control includes the Formal Religious Organizations themselves. They are a part of The Trust. Worse, it’s not just the ones that exist today; rather, this goes back forever. I’m not talking about the inspirations of the various Religions (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), I’m talking about the formal Religions, the canned box of beliefs, the tenets, and the control structure that surrounds those tenets. When you really dig into their origins, and the origins of the tenets themselves, and more importantly, what's been left out, an entirely new picture emerges of the nature of our reality.

In the case of Religion, which J.P. is espousing, whether the beliefs of that Religion are true or not, the Religion itself puts the mind into a box. Thus any investigation from within that box fails if any important evidence is outside of it. So IF it isn’t true, or is missing really important pieces of information, a person will not see it, nor will they be able to see it, because they believe their box contains all the truth there is on the subject.

I suggest the only way to get to the truth is to keep your mind open to seeing all of the evidence. If you are in a box, if you are “Religious” over “Spiritual” you have placed yourself in a box of someone’s design. Every other cult than yours believes their box is special; divinely inspired. "There is no need to look at anything else; it’s all self-contained." What makes yours right, when all the others are wrong? Might they all be boxes, designed to control?

I’m not trying to tell anyone “the Truth.” I don’t know what the Truth is. But I suggest if you aren’t willing to look at certain pieces of evidence in earnest, you should ask yourself "why?" Is it because your beliefs make you feel safe? It is by exploitation of our concept of “safety” that all fuckery occurs in all other areas ("Those who would give us Liberty for Security will get neither" (paraphrased)). Is it POSSIBLE, that that has happened in the beliefs systems that ruled most of the world for the previous two millennia as well?

I suggest that if you can’t ask that question in earnest, you are still stuck in The Matrix.

My investigation suggests that everything other than Religion is Controlled Opposition. People are placed into boxes; their thoughts and beliefs are guided through Propaganda, Rhetoric, Experts, and False Flags. Every event that I have looked in to has shown direct control on all sides by the same Agency.

This Evil that J.P. Sears says he has seen that led him to The Good has been controlled by Someone. Nothing is organic. The questions are, Who was the evil controlled by, and why. The "how" is important too, but my report (linked above) is all about the how.

"Who" is a group I call The Trust. The Trust is sometimes called The Cabal, or Satanists, or the Illuminati, etc. I call them The Trust because they currently rule by Trust Law; laws specific to a type of corporation (legal entity) called a "trust." I suggest their name is irrelevant and tends to place investigation itself into a box.

My investigation suggests The Trust is everywhere, and they control everything. My investigation suggests that all entities in "opposition" are either created by or, if they arise organically and reach sufficient popularity, are subjugated by The Trust. In other words, there are, on this planet, as far as I have been able to find, zero organizations with reasonable popularity that were not created by or subjugated by this single entity. That may have changed recently, but I am not convinced of that. For now, I will assume nothing. Through the control of these organizations, the beliefs of everyone across the planet are controlled by The Trust. I call this conglomeration of beliefs The Matrix. The organizations (echo chambers) that promote all the various beliefs have at the top, and scattered throughout, agents of The Trust. It is these people who’s work gains prominence because they get the financial backing and the promotion in publication and the news required to “make it big.”

Most people here are aware this happens in the corporate world, the government, and any “Leftish Political Group” (BLM, Antifa, etc.). What some appreciate, but not all, is that all the “right” groups are also controlled by the same entity. The Right's beliefs have been guided just as much as those on the left. Both sides receive parts of the Truth, but not the whole truth. They are set against each other through talking points handed out by the talking heads. This allows “The Left” and “The Right” to focus on their disagreements, not looking at their commonalities; not attempting to discuss, but rather, fight over “irreconcilable differences.” They are only irreconcilable because they are designed to be. Each side takes a stance for which there can be no compromise, thus there will only be a strict line of division. I call this method of control "The Prison of Two Ideas."

WRT the OP, J.P. gives reasons for his “change of heart” on what is “truth”. He cites evidence that supports some of the tenets of his new/old Religion. Because things he thought were bullshit before turned out to have evidence for, he assumes that all of the tenets that he formerly believed were false are actually true. This is a self-induced fallacy of composition argument. “Part of it is true, when I thought it wasn’t, therefore the rest must be true as well.” The evidence suggests that this fallacy is used intentionally through rhetoric (and thus taught to us and commonly employed in our reasoning) in all other areas of controlling the beliefs of people, a form of Controlled Opposition.

He also says that the “other side” (in this case Communism) are trying to keep us away from these tenets, and Communism is bad, therefore “what they are trying to hide” must be the truth. That also is a self-induced fallacy, in this case an ad hominem (against the person argument), and a fundamental control system for controlled opposition in all other areas. I suggest ad hominems are the most prevelant form of rhetoric that guides belief. They are so common in fact, they literally rule the world. Or rather, the world is ruled by the creation of “other,” and by stating “other’s beliefs” are false because they are other. Through this method of dismissal, we allow ourselves to not actually listen to what “other” is really saying. Instead we pull out the talking points we were handed and use them as rebuttal. Those “rebuttals” are designed to cause a reaction strictly in opposition, thus keeping everyone divided. Controlled Opposition.

When a person transitions their beliefs, in all other areas (a Left to Right shift, e.g.), they transition from one box to another by these self-induced logical fallacies.

If these methods are employed in all other areas, is it possible that all of our beliefs are subject to the same controlling entity?

My investigation has put it beyond a reasonable doubt (for me) that this same method of control includes the Formal Religious Organizations themselves. They are a part of The Trust. Worse, it’s not just the ones that exist today; rather, this goes back forever. I’m not talking about the inspirations of the various Religions (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), I’m talking about the formal Religions, the canned box of beliefs, the tenets, and the control structure that surrounds those tenets. When you really dig into their origins, and the origins of the tenets themselves, and more importantly, what's been left out, an entirely new picture emerges of the nature of our reality.

In the case of Religion, which J.P. is espousing, whether the beliefs of that Religion are true or not, the Religion itself puts the mind into a box. Thus any investigation from within that box fails if any important evidence is outside of it. So IF it isn’t true, or is missing really important pieces of information, a person will not see it, nor will they be able to see it, because they believe their box contains all the truth there is on the subject.

I suggest the only way to get to the truth is to keep your mind open to seeing all of the evidence. If you are in a box, if you are “Religious” over “Spiritual” you have placed yourself in a box of someone’s design. Every other cult believes their box is special; divinely inspired. "There is no need to look at anything else; it’s all self-contained."

I’m not trying to tell anyone “the Truth.” I don’t know what the Truth is. But I suggest if you aren’t willing to look at certain pieces of evidence in earnest, you should ask yourself "why?" Is it because your beliefs make you feel safe? It is by exploitation of our concept of “safety” that all fuckery occurs in all other areas ("Those who would give us Liberty for Security will get neither" (paraphrased)). Is it POSSIBLE, that that has happened in the beliefs systems that ruled most of the world for the previous two millennia as well?

I suggest that if you can’t ask that question in earnest, you are still stuck in The Matrix.

My investigation suggests that everything other than Religion is Controlled Opposition. People are placed into boxes; their thoughts and beliefs are guided through Propaganda, Rhetoric, Experts, and False Flags. Every event that I have looked in to has shown direct control on all sides by the same Agency.

This Evil that J.P. Sears says he has seen that led him to The Good has been controlled by Someone. Nothing is organic. The questions are, Who was the evil controlled by, and why. The "how" is important too, but my report (linked above) is all about the how.

"Who" is a group I call The Trust. The Trust is sometimes called The Cabal, or Satanists, or the Illuminati, etc. I call them The Trust because they currently rule by Trust Law; laws specific to a type of corporation (legal entity) called a "trust." I suggest their name is irrelevant and tends to place investigation itself into a box.

My investigation suggests The Trust is everywhere, and they control everything. My investigation suggests that all entities in "opposition" are either created by or, if they arise organically and reach sufficient popularity, are subjugated by The Trust. In other words, there are, on this planet, as far as I have been able to find, zero organizations with reasonable popularity that were not created by or subjugated by this single entity. That may have changed recently, but I am not convinced of that. For now, I will assume nothing. Through the control of these organizations, the beliefs of everyone across the planet are controlled by The Trust. I call this conglomeration of beliefs The Matrix. The organizations (echo chambers) that promote all the various beliefs have at the top, and scattered throughout, agents of The Trust. It is these people who’s work gains prominence because they get the financial backing and the promotion in publication and the news required to “make it big.”

Most people here are aware this happens in the corporate world, the government, and any “Leftish Political Group” (BLM, Antifa, etc.). What some appreciate, but not all, is that all the “right” groups are also controlled by the same entity. The Right's beliefs have been guided just as much as those on the left. Both sides receive parts of the Truth, but not the whole truth. They are set against each other through talking points handed out by the talking heads. This allows “The Left” and “The Right” to focus on their disagreements, not looking at their commonalities; not attempting to discuss, but rather, fight over “irreconcilable differences.” They are only irreconcilable because they are designed to be. Each side takes a stance for which there can be no compromise, thus there will only be a strict line of division. I call this method of control "The Prison of Two Ideas."

WRT the OP, J.P. gives reasons for his “change of heart” on what is “truth”. He cites evidence that supports some of the tenets of his new/old Religion. Because things he thought were bullshit before turned out to have evidence for, he assumes that all of the tenets he formerly believed were false are actually true. This is a self-induced fallacy of composition argument. “Part of it is true, when I thought it wasn’t, therefore the rest must be true as well.” The evidence suggests that this fallacy is used intentionally through rhetoric (and thus taught to us and commonly employed in our reasoning) in all other areas of controlling the beliefs of people, a form of Controlled Opposition.

He also says that the “other side” (in this case Communism) are trying to keep us away from these tenets, and Communism is bad, therefore “what they are trying to hide” must be the truth. That also is a self-induced fallacy, in this case an ad hominem (against the person argument), and a fundamental control system for controlled opposition in all other areas. I suggest ad hominems are the most prevelant form of rhetoric that guides belief. They are so common in fact, they literally rule the world. Or rather, the world is ruled by the creation of “other,” and by stating “other’s beliefs” are false because they are other. Through this method of dismissal, we allow ourselves to not actually listen to what “other” is really saying. Instead we pull out the talking points we were handed and use them as rebuttal. Those “rebuttals” are designed to cause a reaction strictly in opposition, thus keeping everyone divided. Controlled Opposition.

When a person transitions their beliefs, in all other areas (a Left to Right shift, e.g.), they transition from one box to another by these self-induced logical fallacies.

If these methods are employed in all other areas, is it possible that all of our beliefs are subject to the same controlling entity?

My investigation has put it beyond a reasonable doubt (for me) that this same method of control includes the Formal Religious Organizations themselves. They are a part of The Trust. Worse, it’s not just the ones that exist today; rather, this goes back forever. I’m not talking about the inspirations of the various Religions (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), I’m talking about the formal Religions, the canned box of beliefs, the tenets, and the control structure that surrounds those tenets. When you really dig into their origins, and the origins of the tenets themselves, and more importantly, what's been left out, an entirely new picture emerges of the nature of our reality.

In the case of Religion, which J.P. is espousing, whether the beliefs of that Religion are true or not, the Religion itself puts the mind into a box. Thus any investigation from within that box fails if any important evidence is outside of it. So IF it isn’t true, or is missing really important pieces of information, a person will not see it, nor will they be able to see it, because they believe their box contains all the truth there is on the subject.

I suggest the only way to get to the truth is to keep your mind open to seeing all of the evidence. If you are in a box, if you are “Religious” over “Spiritual” you have placed yourself in a box of someone’s design. Every other cult believes their box is special; divinely inspired. "There is no need to look at anything else; it’s all self-contained."

I’m not trying to tell anyone “the Truth.” I don’t know what the Truth is. But I suggest if you aren’t willing to look at certain pieces of evidence in earnest, you should ask yourself "why?" Is it because your beliefs make you feel safe? It is by exploitation of our concept of “safety” that all fuckery occurs in all other areas ("Those who would give us Liberty for Security will get neither" (paraphrased)). Is it POSSIBLE, that that has happened in the beliefs systems that ruled most of the world for the previous two millennia as well?

I suggest that if you can’t ask that question in earnest, you are still stuck in The Matrix.

My investigation suggests that everything other than Religion is Controlled Opposition. People are placed into boxes; their thoughts and beliefs are guided through Propaganda, Rhetoric, Experts, and False Flags. Every event that I have looked in to has shown direct control on all sides by the same Agency.

This Evil that J.P. Sears says he has seen that led him to The Good has been controlled by Someone. Nothing is organic. The questions are, Who was the evil controlled by, and why. The "how" is important too, but my report (linked above) is all about the how.

"Who" is a group I call The Trust. The Trust is sometimes called The Cabal, or Satanists, or the Illuminati, etc. I call them The Trust because they currently rule by Trust Law; laws specific to a type of corporation (legal entity) called a "trust." I suggest their name is irrelevant and tends to place investigation itself into a box.

My investigation suggests The Trust is everywhere, and they control everything. My investigation suggests that all entities in "opposition" are either created by or, if they arise organically and reach sufficient popularity, are subjugated by The Trust. In other words, there are, on this planet, as far as I have been able to find, zero organizations with reasonable popularity that were not created by or subjugated by this single entity. That may have changed recently, but I am not convinced of that. For now, I will assume nothing. Through the control of these organizations, the beliefs of everyone across the planet are controlled by The Trust. I call this conglomeration of beliefs The Matrix. The organizations (echo chambers) that promote all the various beliefs have at the top, and scattered throughout, agents of The Trust. It is these people who’s work gains prominence because they get the financial backing and the promotion in publication and the news required to “make it big.”

Most people here are aware this happens in the corporate world, the government, and any “Leftish Political Group” (BLM, Antifa, etc.). What some appreciate, but not all, is that all the “right” groups are also controlled by the same entity. The Right's beliefs have been guided just as much as those on the left. Both sides receive parts of the Truth, but not the whole truth. They are set against each other through talking points handed out by the talking heads. This allows “The Left” and “The Right” to focus on their disagreements, not looking at their commonalities; not attempting to discuss, but rather, fight over “irreconcilable differences.” They are only irreconcilable because they are designed to be. Each side takes a stance for which there can be no compromise, thus there will only be a strict line of division. I call this method of control "The Prison of Two Ideas."

WRT the OP, J.P. gives reasons for his “change of heart” on what is “truth”. He cites evidence that supports some of the tenets of his new/old Religion. Because things he thought were bullshit before turned out to have evidence against, he assumes that all of the tenets he formerly believed were false are actually true. This is a self-induced fallacy of composition argument. “Part of it is true, when I thought it wasn’t, therefore the rest must be true as well.” The evidence suggests that this fallacy is used intentionally through rhetoric (and thus taught to us and commonly employed in our reasoning) in all other areas of controlling the beliefs of people, a form of Controlled Opposition.

He also says that the “other side” (in this case Communism) are trying to keep us away from these tenets, and Communism is bad, therefore “what they are trying to hide” must be the truth. That also is a self-induced fallacy, in this case an ad hominem (against the person argument), and a fundamental control system for controlled opposition in all other areas. I suggest ad hominems are the most prevelant form of rhetoric that guides belief. They are so common in fact, they literally rule the world. Or rather, the world is ruled by the creation of “other,” and by stating “other’s beliefs” are false because they are other. Through this method of dismissal, we allow ourselves to not actually listen to what “other” is really saying. Instead we pull out the talking points we were handed and use them as rebuttal. Those “rebuttals” are designed to cause a reaction strictly in opposition, thus keeping everyone divided. Controlled Opposition.

When a person transitions their beliefs, in all other areas (a Left to Right shift, e.g.), they transition from one box to another by these self-induced logical fallacies.

If these methods are employed in all other areas, is it possible that all of our beliefs are subject to the same controlling entity?

My investigation has put it beyond a reasonable doubt (for me) that this same method of control includes the Formal Religious Organizations themselves. They are a part of The Trust. Worse, it’s not just the ones that exist today; rather, this goes back forever. I’m not talking about the inspirations of the various Religions (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), I’m talking about the formal Religions, the canned box of beliefs, the tenets, and the control structure that surrounds those tenets. When you really dig into their origins, and the origins of the tenets themselves, and more importantly, what's been left out, an entirely new picture emerges of the nature of our reality.

In the case of Religion, which J.P. is espousing, whether the beliefs of that Religion are true or not, the Religion itself puts the mind into a box. Thus any investigation from within that box fails if any important evidence is outside of it. So IF it isn’t true, or is missing really important pieces of information, a person will not see it, nor will they be able to see it, because they believe their box contains all the truth there is on the subject.

I suggest the only way to get to the truth is to keep your mind open to seeing all of the evidence. If you are in a box, if you are “Religious” over “Spiritual” you have placed yourself in a box of someone’s design. Every other cult believes their box is special; divinely inspired. "There is no need to look at anything else; it’s all self-contained."

I’m not trying to tell anyone “the Truth.” I don’t know what the Truth is. But I suggest if you aren’t willing to look at certain pieces of evidence in earnest, you should ask yourself "why?" Is it because your beliefs make you feel safe? It is by exploitation of our concept of “safety” that all fuckery occurs in all other areas ("Those who would give us Liberty for Security will get neither" (paraphrased)). Is it POSSIBLE, that that has happened in the beliefs systems that ruled most of the world for the previous two millennia as well?

I suggest that if you can’t ask that question in earnest, you are still stuck in The Matrix.