Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Maybe Malone will use that 25 million he gained by lawfare off another good guy to fight the deep state. /s

1 year ago
0 score
Reason: None provided.

Effortlessly this guy, the first prominent medical professional to stick his neck out and question the vaccines, who should be the sworn enemy of the establishment for doing this, used lawfare to protect his reputation to the tune of 25 million. He didn't point his lawyers at Pfizer or the government for misusing his work and damaging his reputation by that misuse, he pointed them at a small good guy doctor for criticizing his work that was being misused by the government, and questioning (reasonable to question) Malone's incentives and conflicts of interest, and whose credibility was better than Malone's own in terms of morality and ethics and placed him verifiably at odds with what know to be the deep state.

Malone is enough of a turd for me not to care whether he's a deep state turd or just a private agenda turd -- turds are turds.

Sorry for the shit run-on grammar. Its so bad I don't even know where to start in fixing that, but I don't want to delete the whole counterpoint. Malone seems like a contingency gatekeeper and if he is, its an interesting study in how good they are at this kind of thing and maybe how to identify them.

1 year ago
0 score
Reason: None provided.

Effortlessly this guy, the first prominent medical professional to stick his neck out and question the vaccines, who should be the sworn enemy of the establishment for doing this, used lawfare to protect his reputation to the tune of 25 million. He didn't point his lawyers at Pfizer or the government for misusing his work and damaging his reputation by that misuse, he pointed them at a small good guy doctor for criticizing his work that was being misused by the government, and questioning (reasonable to question) Malone's incentives and conflicts of interest, and whose credibility was better than Malone's own in terms of morality and ethics and placed him verifiably at odds with what know to be the deep state.

Malone is enough of a turd for me not to care whether he's a deep state turd or just a private agenda turd -- turds are turds.

Sorry for the shit run-on grammar. Its so bad I don't even know where to start in fixing that, but I don't want to delete the whole counterpoint. Malone seems like a contingency gatekeeper and if he is, its an interesting study in how good they are at this kind of thing and how to identify them. (by their peripheral actions and inconsistent motives.)

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Effortlessly this guy, the first prominent medical professional to stick his neck out and question the vaccines, who should be the sworn enemy of the establishment for doing this, used lawfare to protect his reputation to the tune of 25 million. He didn't point his lawyers at Pfizer or the government for misusing his work and damaging his reputation by that misuse, he pointed them at a small good guy doctor for criticizing his work that was being misused by the government, and questioning (reasonable to question) Malone's incentives and conflicts of interest, and whose credibility was better than Malone's own in terms of morality and ethics and placed him verifiably at odds with what know to be the deep state.

Malone is enough of a turd for me not to care whether he's a deep state turd or just a private agenda turd -- turds are turds.

Sorry for the shit run-on grammar. Its so bad I don't even know where to start in fixing that, but I don't want to delete the whole counterpoint. Malone seems like a contingency gatekeeper and if he is, its an interesting study in how good they are at this kind of thing and how to identify them. (by their peripheral actions)

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Effortlessly this guy, the first prominent medical professional to stick his neck out and question the vaccines, who should be the sworn enemy of the establishment for doing this, used lawfare to protect his reputation to the tune of 25 million. He didn't point his lawyers at Pfizer or the government for misusing his work and damaging his reputation by that misuse, he pointed them at a small good guy doctor for criticizing his work that was being misused by the government, and questioning (reasonable to question) Malone's incentives and conflicts of interest, and whose credibility was better than Malone's own in terms of morality and ethics and placed him verifiably at odds with what know to be the deep state.

Malone is enough of a turd for me not to care whether he's a deep state turd or just a private agenda turd -- turds are turds.

1 year ago
1 score